[Poll] On DST's Lore Development
I am not your king yet old man! Nor should you obey that command even if I were!
111 members have voted
-
1. How satisfied are you with Don't Starve Together's lore development?
-
Very Satisfied
-
Satisfied
-
Unsatisfied
-
Very Unsatisfied
-
I have no strong feelings regarding this.
-
-
2. Which portions of the lore should Klei focus on developing the most?
-
Character lore (inc. interactions)
-
The Main storyline (after the return of Them, alter, wotsisname)
-
The lore of the Constant's origin
-
the lore of the Ancients
-
The lore behind the Constant's regions
-
The lore behind the Constant's flora
-
The lore behind the Constant's fauna
-
Other (do mention in the comments!)
-
-
3. If you answered "Very Satisfied/Satisfied", why so?
-
The lore is very well thought out.
-
The lore gives enough details for us while keeping the mystery and intrigue it is known for.
-
The lore allows one to form their own theories and conclusions regarding the story of DST.
-
The lore is emotionally moving.
-
The lore is funny.
-
The lore retains the macabre, horrifying aspect it used to have.
-
I voted "Very Unsatisfied/Unsatisfied."
-
Other (do mention in the comments!)
-
I voted "no strong feelings."
-
-
4. If you answered "Very Unsatisfied/Unsatisfied", why so?
-
The lore is half-baked.
-
The lore leaves too many plot holes open and gives too many unanswered questions.
-
The lore is too rigid in its main framework for outside theories.
-
The lore relies too much on emotional manipulation.
-
The lore is bland and boring.
-
Questions, conflicting theories and related concerns on the lore are unaddressed.
-
I voted "Very Satisfied/Satisfied."
-
Other (do mention in the comments!)
-
I voted "no strong feelings."
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.