Jump to content

Is there a way to get a refund?


Recommended Posts

Well, after some time playing, the game updated, raising the minimum specs. Now I'm totally unable to play it unless I buy a new PC, which is probably not gonna happen soon.

So, I asked for a refund on steam justifying the 63 hours spent with the no longer ability to play the game. But it was rejected

Is it fair that I spent R$27,99(Brazilian currency) for a game that I can no longer play?

most of my friends that have the game already stacked over 500 hours into it. :(

4 hours ago, JimmyJam said:

Dude i don't take this the wrong way but you got 63 hours in the game! that's a lot...

63 isn't that much for a game. Not that its a bad value overall (0.44/hour) but in terms of games thats not as cheap/cost effective as most.

Also, When you buy Don't starve together it gives you 2 copies of the game, so if you already gifted the other copy it would be hard to be refounded.

Also, if i were you i should keep it on the library, like me: I have 4 games that are not supported by my laptop and i just keep them there so i when i get a new computer i can play them without having to pay again.

8 hours ago, spiderdian said:

Well, after some time playing, the game updated, raising the minimum specs. Now I'm totally unable to play it unless I buy a new PC, which is probably not gonna happen soon.

So, I asked for a refund on steam justifying the 63 hours spent with the no longer ability to play the game. But it was rejected

Is it fair that I spent R$27,99(Brazilian currency) for a game that I can no longer play?

most of my friends that have the game already stacked over 500 hours into it. :(

Uhmm are you sure you cant play on your PC? If you dont mind me asking what PC you have that you cant run this? 

I have little cousines that are in love with this game and i install DST on their calculators and it is running just fine. 

Are you sure its not problem with your OS but with your PC?

Well, since Steam decided against providing to you a refund.

Let's try and get this running again on your rig.

 

What is the error the log saves when you try running the game?

You can find the file location for that from the help ticket: Here.

11 minutes ago, smallishbird said:

The devs already told spiderdian that his graphics card doesn't meet the minimal system requirements. 

Well if those requirements are the one on store page i don't meet them either and DST is working just fine .)

9 minutes ago, smallishbird said:

The devs already told spiderdian that his graphics card doesn't meet the minimal system requirements. 

Mmm, yeah.

Spiderdian has a GPU that supports shader model 2, whereas DST needs 3.

 

There's some software from TransGaming called SwiftShader that emulates the shader model 3 on the CPU, which should let this user play the game.

I haven't tested this software personally but it might be a venue worth looking into.

10 hours ago, CarlZalph said:

Mmm, yeah.

Spiderdian has a GPU that supports shader model 2, whereas DST needs 3.

 

There's some software from TransGaming called SwiftShader that emulates the shader model 3 on the CPU, which should let this user play the game.

I haven't tested this software personally but it might be a venue worth looking into.

Hm....I might give it a try, but the last time I used swiftshader it crashed my computer(yeah, it's awfully bad)

19 hours ago, JimmyJam said:

Dude i don't take this the wrong way but you got 63 hours in the game! that's a lot...

Not compared to what I usually play

Also there are games much cheaper than this one that I played over 100 hours, like terraria on Pc and other on PS3-4

15 hours ago, Soto8969 said:

Also, When you buy Don't starve together it gives you 2 copies of the game, so if you already gifted the other copy it would be hard to be refounded.

Also, if i were you i should keep it on the library, like me: I have 4 games that are not supported by my laptop and i just keep them there so i when i get a new computer i can play them without having to pay again.

Well, I don't know if that counts, but the friend I gave the copy only played the time I gave him, around 2-3 hours

44 minutes ago, JohaneBrote said:

Well if you have a PS maybe it wouldn't be so bad if you waited for the PS version to come out. I'm pretty sure you won't have to buy it separately, although don't quote me on that one.

I cant see them giving the game away again...

8 minutes ago, JimmyJam said:

I cant see them giving the game away again...

Currently you get the Linux version alongside the Windows version free of charge, although admittedly that's not quite the same. But yeah, it might not make much sense for them to do that.

On 22/04/2016 at 7:02 PM, JohaneBrote said:

Well if you have a PS maybe it wouldn't be so bad if you waited for the PS version to come out. I'm pretty sure you won't have to buy it separately, although don't quote me on that one.

I doubt something like that would happen. The same reason as they couldn't add the multiplayer as a DLC or update. Then engine mechanics are too different, mainly the menus

On 4/22/2016 at 10:02 AM, CarlZalph said:

Spiderdian has a GPU that supports shader model 2, whereas DST needs 3.

If he has a shader model 2 graphic card, then this graphic card is around 12 years old. New games can't continue to build on old frameworks, libraries, .... This is a beta game and in development. Every game developer does this. Most people are not (much) interested in buying a game, which does not scale with current technology and possibilities.

1 hour ago, werlpolf said:

If he has a shader model 2 graphic card, then this graphic card is around 12 years old. New games can't continue to build on old frameworks, libraries, ....

I'm not sure where this is coming from.

Why can't new games support old hardware?

It's a lot of work on the developer's part to create GPU-related shaders to visually be very similar for each revision of GPU hardware support to be sure.

However, it is fairly straightforward to have shaders disabled on hardware that doesn't support them.

This would allow the base game to still be played, even if some of the effects are no longer present.

1 hour ago, werlpolf said:

This is a beta game and in development.

It is out of Early Access and no longer in the beta phase, though still in development to be sure!

1 hour ago, werlpolf said:

Every game developer does this. Most people are not (much) interested in buying a game, which does not scale with current technology and possibilities.

These statements need some sort of citation, because otherwise they should be reworded to have "in my opinion" or the like.

I.E. "I feel like every game developer should do this.  I think most people are not (much) interested in buying a game, which does not scale with current technology and possibilities."

1 hour ago, CarlZalph said:

Why can't new games support old hardware?

Developers can, but I think :-), it will not be worth it, since code for old and new hardware can be incompatible sometimes and then difficult to handle / develop / support. Does Microsoft support Windows XP? I love it, that DST is running on Linux, too!!!

21 hours ago, CarlZalph said:

no longer in the beta phase

 

18 hours ago, Gingerbread said:

This is not a beta game anymore.

ok, ok, I got it :D

one last tip: check this site out

http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/

Search one of the graphic cards of your friends there. Then buy a graphic card, that has quite same performance (points) and which is cheaper.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.

×
  • Create New...