Jump to content

Magmatic portraits aren't bad


Recommended Posts

I know when they first came out the Portraits were pretty much universally hated, from what I've heard, and Honestly I think that was an over-reaction. Because they're not that bad.
sure there are some inconstancies, because it looks like the person who did them didn't use a reference for some of them (Wigfrid lacks her tooth-gap, Maxwells chin is weirdly long.), and they somewhat resemble like ONI characters, I understand they were done by a different artist then the main person who does portrait art, and I don't think they're of a lower quality because of that, because there are a few poor decisions with the art, but overall they're not that bad, seriously, I think they hold up Today pretty well, a lot of the characters expressions and posing is exceptional. I think a lot of the shock came from the abrupt style change since the art is noticeably different from other portraits, and that's why people hated on them.

And Honestly this is coming from I bias I have against them since I think the fire hair on a few of them is really boring design choice.


I do not think the Magmatics are the worst skin portraits by any means, there are far worse offenders that I haven't seen many people talk about. (ex. Warly's DST portrait, Wortox's portrait, and Maxwell's Gaping Maw in his Untriumphant)

Spoiler

Also I hate how Klei keeps zooming in on a lot of the newer portraits, PLEASE give us more fullbody portraits.


 

I agree, the portrait art for the skin sets aren't terrible, while they do look a bit off, and to me, feel a little cheap, I wouldn't call them bad. I guess compared to the majority of the other character portraits, they stick out like a sore thumb. Also, I think Warly's DST portrait art looks so good compared to the one in shipwrecked. The drawing feels more clean and refined while having Warly strike a nice pose.

7 minutes ago, GrapeVruit said:

I think Warly's DST portrait art looks so good compared to the one in shipwrecked. The drawing feels more clean and refined while having Warly strike a nice pose.

you think this
image.png.4cc14616784040bdeb4db24c4e8f00c5.png

looks better then this?
image.png.2ebeb7ddcf1693a0be9479c636aaf210.png


alsol i think the single player version is better, i mean, he cooks food and puts spice on it, while in multy he just looks at a fish

5 minutes ago, GrapeVruit said:

I agree, the portrait art for the skin sets aren't terrible, while they do look a bit off, and to me, feel a little cheap, I wouldn't call them bad. I guess compared to the majority of the other character portraits, they stick out like a sore thumb. Also, I think Warly's DST portrait art looks so good compared to the one in shipwrecked. The drawing feels more clean and refined while having Warly strike a nice pose.

I disagree, Warly's DST portrait doesn't fit in at all with any other portraits in game, on top of being an unnecessary change, the colours aren't nearly muted enough in my opninion to fit with other DST portraits, His limbs are weirdly lanky, and his pose isn't nearly as interesting or show anything about his character. he's just staring at a fish, compared to his SW that's a downgrade.

20 minutes ago, WhackE said:

I disagree, Warly's DST portrait doesn't fit in at all with any other portraits in game, on top of being an unnecessary change, the colours aren't nearly muted enough in my opninion to fit with other DST portraits, His limbs are weirdly lanky, and his pose isn't nearly as interesting or show anything about his character. he's just staring at a fish, compared to his SW that's a downgrade.

Well, to each his own. I do understand your last point though. I guess from my point of view, the way that Warly's staring at the fish makes it seem like he's thinking up different ways on how he can incorporate it into his many dishes, as well as looking slightly more confident compared to his art in SW. But on the surface level, it's literally just a guy looking at a fish. And while I'm not the biggest fan of his portrait art in SW, it does show him cooking in his portable crockpot. 

My main problem with the Magmatics was the outfits themselves; they looked EXTREMELY anime and really strong reminded me of other serieses.  While I can appreciate a good reference as well as the next person, sometimes it seems like Don't Starve Together is...I dunno...trying too hard to tap into the popular thing?  But on the other hand, I'm perfectly FINE with things like Willow's Wednesday from the "Addams Family" look.  I guess my criteria is...

Is the thing they're really obviously "referencing" something that _already fits the tone and style of the game_?
If Y, kinda-grudging "fine". 
If N, raise eyebrow and look at the new thing suspiciously with folded arms.

I kinda think the Magmatic outfits are cool looks in and of themselves, but I dunno if I want _Don't Starve_ characters to dress up like Naruto...

...Notorious

1 hour ago, CaptainChaotica said:

While I can appreciate a good reference as well as the next person, sometimes it seems like Don't Starve Together is...I dunno...trying too hard to tap into the popular thing?  

Wilson's roseate skin is a reference to shadow the hEDGEhog

Totally not a coincedence

Personally, I'm not the biggest fan of them. Most of the models in-game looked pretty... I don't know, scraggly? In my opinion the only one that came out looking pretty well was WX, which, I mean, clearly I'm not the only one as the WX magmatic skin was used in promo art, they're plastered all over the whole magmatic collection, it has it's own loading screen image... Clearly even the devs thought magmatic WX looks good, and to their credit, it does. :p

Although, with the others... Like I said, they kinda look messy to me. Not just the portraits, but how they actually look. That and Wigfrid's looks really boring compared to the others - The only one with normally red hair and they DON'T get a fire-looking effect? Ugh.

2 hours ago, CaptainChaotica said:

My main problem with the Magmatics was the outfits themselves; they looked EXTREMELY anime and really strong reminded me of other serieses.  While I can appreciate a good reference as well as the next person, sometimes it seems like Don't Starve Together is...I dunno...trying too hard to tap into the popular thing?

I kinda think the Magmatic outfits are cool looks in and of themselves, but I dunno if I want _Don't Starve_ characters to dress up like Naruto...

wat

Well it might not be Naruto exactly, I might be misremembering...

...but they ARE really anime-esque, especially, like, Winona's for example.

magmaticvignette.thumb.png.4235e397c514e48325dae34c318a8d9e.png

I dunno what that is, exactly, but that visor and hair definitely makes Winona look like she's from...SOMEthing.  And Wilson with that hair and armor is kinda rockin' a JRPG (possibly Dragon Quest?) thing...

For me, there's just something about the style of these that's _juuuuuuuuuuuust_ far enough into another, non-DS-esque recognisable look, that it kinda jumps out at you.  (shrug)

Spoiler

...and it ain't just me, I remember when these pictures first came out, there were MULTIPLE people saying it looked like anime, and I'm pretty damn sure I read the word "Naruto" somewhere in that thread, so...

...Notorious

Compare Forge V2 skins to literally anything. They look completly out of place, both portraits and visuals.

Its also funny to me how many of you agrees that this collections sucks here and there but still accept it as "fine" just not to look mean to Klei artists. lol

13 hours ago, WhackE said:

he's just staring at a fish

That's obviously a parody of the famous Shakespearean pose out of Hamlet, of looking at a skull while thinking about To Be, Or Not To Be (alas, poor Yorrick). I find the idea of Warly having an existential crisis over a fish pretty damn hilarious. HamletSkullHCSealous.jpg.a17b051172ffda2476996d0172e23091.jpg

Also, I LIKE the magmatic set. I got the vignette of the survivors with the flag and it brings me happiness everytime it shows up in my loading screen. I permanently use magmatic skins for Winona and Willow as well. The Forge by itself had a completely different playstyle than standard DST, why not go a bit crazier with the artstyle? I LOVE the artstyle of Gorge vignettes, but Forge is fine too for me. It's a completely subjective thing but I really don't understand why the magmatic series would get hate.

28 minutes ago, Falkenpelz said:

That's obviously a parody of the famous Shakespearean pose out of Hamlet, of looking at a skull while thinking about To Be, Or Not To Be (alas, poor Yorrick). I find the idea of Warly having an existential crisis over a fish pretty damn hilarious. HamletSkullHCSealous.jpg.a17b051172ffda2476996d0172e23091.jpg

Also, I LIKE the magmatic set. I got the vignette of the survivors with the flag and it brings me happiness everytime it shows up in my loading screen. I permanently use magmatic skins for Winona and Willow as well. The Forge by itself had a completely different playstyle than standard DST, why not go a bit crazier with the artstyle? I LOVE the artstyle of Gorge vignettes, but Forge is fine too for me. It's a completely subjective thing but I really don't understand why the magmatic series would get hate.

Funny how that's the second time where that particular pose was referenced on the portrait images.

Guess willow ponders to burn or not the burn while warly is just contemplating which gourmet dish {definitely Moqueca} he can incorperate the existance of that fish into.

WillowPondere.thumb.png.32c2ab8645cc5a8f7e3ff80439d7eeba.png

Just now, SinancoTheBest said:

Funny how that's the second time where that particular pose was referenced on the portrait images.

WillowPondere.thumb.png.32c2ab8645cc5a8f7e3ff80439d7eeba.png

Since the entire franchise is full of Shakespeare references, there's probably more. Wilba saying "Alas, poor Wilba" when examining her own skeleton is another one.

10 hours ago, Cheggf said:

This whole thread is you smack talking how bad the portraits are with objective faults but acting like it isn't an issue because the portraits look bad for a reason instead of just randomly.

no? I genuinely think they're fine, they just stand out and have some faults, but they look fine and have some good aspects to them.

2 hours ago, Falkenpelz said:

That's obviously a parody of the famous Shakespearean pose out of Hamlet, of looking at a skull while thinking about To Be, Or Not To Be (alas, poor Yorrick). I find the idea of Warly having an existential crisis over a fish pretty damn hilarious.
 

 

Wasn't obvious enough for me, then. the Willow example that was given above is much more obvious and better.
 

Quote

It's a completely subjective thing but I really don't understand why the magmatic series would get hate.

From what I've heard the magmatic skins were generally disliked. 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.

×
  • Create New...