Jump to content

Do you WANT Shipwrecked Together


Do you wanted Shipwrecked ported to Together?  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you wanted Shipwrecked ported to Together?

    • Yes. I want Shipwrecked added to Together!
    • No. I do not want Shipwrecked added to Together!
    • No. I do not want Shipwrecked added to Together! However, I do want Walani, Warly, and Wilbur.
    • Other


Recommended Posts

 Ever since Shipwrecked washed ashore, we all have seen the threads on here or on steam about when it's being added to Together.

 

 Personally, I'm not sure I want it on Together. I feel the time and effort could be used to expand the existing world instead and give us both a late game and some pretty cool new mobs and characters instead. While riding around at sea with buddies could be fun, I'd rather see the world we all grew up in evolve into more instead.

 

 As for the characters, I don't really think I'd miss them in the slightest in Together. Walani fits in like a square piece in a triangle hole. She seems too modern from personality to clothing. Gameplay wise, she's the Shipwreck Willow and only offers early game handicaps for Shipwrecked. Works there, not here in our base world. Warly would offer more to Together than Walani for sure, but he isn't overly special either and performs better in Shipwrecked with the island hopping. Wilbur, well I haven't even played Wilbur. I'd think his running could potentially be too strong in Together's world, and I feel his monkey perk could work if he can make monkey huts in the Together world. But who wants monkeys besides Wilbur? I think his companions would burn the huts down. He'd be even more hated than Wes and Willow combined. I think all 3 should be left to Shipwrecked, but Warly has the most potential out of the three if they are added into Together. 

 

 While this may not be a popular opinion, I'd rather Shipwrecked stay separate to give single player some edge that Together will not have. And meanwhile Together can get some new fancy characters and mobs and events that fit better for multiplayer. What is your thoughts?

I'm kinda conflicted. if DST adds SW, then we'll have an ROG situation where no one will buy SW for singleplayer and just have a private server. That being said, it would be awesome to have a gang of pirates floatin' around conquering the high seas! THAT being said, I feel like SW give single player new life and that life would be taken away if SW was added to DST.

Once Through the Ages and Shipwrecked are out of early access and fleshed out I would like to see Klei do a one or two year brake or more if necessary. Once that is over they could come up with a sequel to Don't Starve. It can simply have a 2 at the end of the title, but it would be an upgrade and overhaul of the original game, one they would develop by making sure not to do the mistakes from the past and have a broad view of any future content they would add to the game. 

11 minutes ago, t1morino88eex said:

Once Through the Ages and Shipwrecked are out of early access and fleshed out I would like to see Klei do a one or two year brake or more if necessary. Once that is over they could come up with a sequel to Don't Starve. It can simply have a 2 at the end of the title, but it would be an upgrade and overhaul of the original game, one they would develop by making sure not to do the mistakes from the past and have a broad view of any future content they would add to the game. 

Don't starve together.

Shipwrecked Multiplayer should be it's own game. OR. It should be a sequel. A sequel to DS would be a compendium of new features, new characters and all of the old ones.

Boom. Adventure Mode. Multiplayer. Sailing. Caves. Volcanoes. But all brand new. And all one world. WIth all new characters, and the old ones if you have them installed in DS. (GMOD Mounting System type thing/TWD Saves Carry over to Season 2 type thing.) So we could have ALL of them and a whole new cast. With new DLCs. It would be insanely cool to be having pirate ship battles on all new islands and mainlands with new mounts and enemies.

 

Don't Starve 2 is a terrible name though. Why not, Don't Starve: The Show Must Go On, or Don't Starve: Circus Tricks/Smoke and Mirrors - Something related to the lore. Don't Starve: Checkmate for example. With Wagstaff on the new "throne" and stuff. You gotta admit it would be cool to open Steam one day and find "Don't Starve: Checkmate." - If they do this they have SO got to soft launch it with 0 warning.

 

EDIT2: This was kinda offtopic. The point was: No SW multiplayer game! But DS:C could have some backwards compatibilty hall of fame where you can play SW worlds or RoG worlds or DS1 Vanilla worlds, in Multiplayer too!

 

Also thought I'd clarify this would not include TtA for quite a while, maybe after DST dies down and this comes after. It would be amazing.

 

EDIT3: AND SKINS. SKINS. LOVELY JUICY SKINS. New character skins would just be marked to skip itemgen in DST (Yeah I know your code @nome can't fool me) and all should share one inventory between DST and Don't Starve: Checkmate.

@VexTheHex Hey wheres the I would like Shipwrecked added after they are finished with through the ages. Option?

V Also agree, but hey DEM LOYAL SKINS AMIRITE @Asparagus

9 hours ago, Asparagus said:

Well, adding SW to DST would kinda make SW... obsolete in a way...

I have to disagree about a squeal , I feel that it would split people up and that's no fun. That Said I would be willing to pay for a SW DLC on DST  - so I can add the map for my players. I am a fan of only the host has to own it model , as people who do not have it wont be left out.  I get the feeling this one is going to be harder to enable then the caves.

 

Just now, KittenCanaveral said:

I have to disagree about a squeal , I feel that it would split people up and that's no fun. That Said I would be willing to pay for a SW DLC on DST  - so I can add the map for my players. I am a fan of only the host has to own it model , as people who do not have it wont be left out.  I get the feeling this one is going to be harder to enable then the caves.

 

I was implying a year or two after SW. And after DST is out of beta also. The SW DLC on DST thing should cost more for dedicated servers imo.

3 hours ago, GiddyGuy said:

Don't starve together.

3 hours ago, t1morino88eex said:

@GiddyGuy what's your point?

hi @t1morino88eex, so... basically, in a way... DST is DS's sequel as it was stated that the events in DST are after you (the player/Wilson) frees Maxwell from the throne... for now, that isn't very apparent as we don't get to play as Maxwell without mods... they are still working (hopefully) on Don't Starve Together: Through the Ages... which, I would hope, has all we need... when that will be on, we can only have faith... *:゚*。⋆ฺ(*´◡`)

6 hours ago, PackimBaggins said:

Shipwrecked Multiplayer should be it's own game. OR. It should be a sequel. A sequel to DS would be a compendium of new features, new characters and all of the old ones.

Boom. Adventure Mode. Multiplayer. Sailing. Caves. Volcanoes. But all brand new. And all one world. WIth all new characters, and the old ones if you have them installed in DS. (GMOD Mounting System type thing/TWD Saves Carry over to Season 2 type thing.) So we could have ALL of them and a whole new cast. With new DLCs. It would be insanely cool to be having pirate ship battles on all new islands and mainlands with new mounts and enemies.

 

Don't Starve 2 is a terrible name though. Why not, Don't Starve: The Show Must Go On, or Don't Starve: Circus Tricks/Smoke and Mirrors - Something related to the lore. Don't Starve: Checkmate for example. With Wagstaff on the new "throne" and stuff. You gotta admit it would be cool to open Steam one day and find "Don't Starve: Checkmate." - If they do this they have SO got to soft launch it with 0 warning.

 

EDIT2: This was kinda offtopic. The point was: No SW multiplayer game! But DS:C could have some backwards compatibilty hall of fame where you can play SW worlds or RoG worlds or DS1 Vanilla worlds, in Multiplayer too!

 

Also thought I'd clarify this would not include TtA for quite a while, maybe after DST dies down and this comes after. It would be amazing.

 

EDIT3: AND SKINS. SKINS. LOVELY JUICY SKINS. New character skins would just be marked to skip itemgen in DST (Yeah I know your code @nome can't fool me) and all should share one inventory between DST and Don't Starve: Checkmate.

ERRRRRRRRRRRRR. Did I miss something or are you talking Wagstaff the guy who made the radio? THE RADIO'S ALIVE?!

3 minutes ago, Mikeadatrix said:

ERRRRRRRRRRRRR. Did I miss something or are you talking Wagstaff the guy who made the radio? THE RADIO'S ALIVE?!

Yes I am, Sir Robert Wagstaff, of great significance in the lore! Creator of WX and all things holy. FATHER OF WEBBER.

>Other

While on one hand it would be really cool to have SWT, 

1- it's not the priority right now

2- I actually enjoy the fact that now I'm playing Singleplayer over DST: SW is keeping Singleplayer alive

3- DST already has potential, even without SW (the devs are hinting to some cool late game stuff that's going to be added)

4- Stability: it was already really hard to have Caves run well in DST, so imagine having Forest, Caves, Islands and Volcano worlds all active. It'll be hard to implement a good way to have all the worlds running 

I'd love it as well - what's better than sailing with your friends and dealing with dangerous tropical stuff. I really like the setting (I love tropical archipelagos, even without the pirate theme), and would love to play it with friends

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.

×
  • Create New...