Jump to content

Recommended Posts

hmm im just having fun,

such roundings in math means that the number is to small to prove your point. thats the consequence. so if your right you'd need to increase the difference, which should be easy if your right, just make the test longer. if you can get the change to the degree your actually missing something in that isn't in the least significant value of a number with a single count

You keep saying rounding but you don't really know, because it could be deletion. 

As far as the game is concerned, it is deletion. That's all that matters.

-What is the scope of the larger experiment? 24 tiles, 4800 tiles?

-How big do we have to scale the experiment before the number is no longer insignificant?

Loss is loss. If you did this test across the whole map, and 100Kg was deleted, would it matter then?

You are talking about opinion, perspective, and relative ideas.

1 minute ago, CantBreathe said:

-What is the scope of the larger experiment? 24 tiles, 4800 tiles?

scope of your test is good enough.

1 minute ago, CantBreathe said:

-How big do we have to scale the experiment before the number is no longer insignificant?

 

11 minutes ago, Moonshade said:

if you can get the change to the degree your actually missing something in that isn't in the least significant value of a number with a single count

 

10 + 9 + 8.49 = 26.49 =26.5=26

10 + 9 + 8.5 = 26.5 =27

when dealing with the least significant number you can and will get errors in roundings, In any form of science you need to prove your correct or wrong outside the margin of error.

I stay with my statement, the prove given is insuffcient to prove his point that the doors delete the gasses

to be fair i haven't given any proof I'm correct about the deletion of gas either I'm to lazy for that.
but that doesn't mean I can't blow holes in the proof someone gives me.and disagree with that

doors can and will delete any gas caught within them if the following conditions are met and sometimes even when they aren't
 A) The top of the door is blocked on 3 sides and the gas is mixed or contains hydrogen
B) automation closes the door faster than 1 second

C) doors close with no exit for the gas
These are known facts not debatable rounding errors, play the game and stop arguing for the sake of show boating please, because ultimately, your in the wrong regardless of your "factual accuracy with regard to rounding"  when you don't even know if the system is using any rounding at all so shushhh please

I have some evidence to suggest rounding is used. 

I set up a test similar to @CantBreathe's setup and automated the sequential opening an closing of the doors (using the 1 second buffer/1second filter method. I let that run for a good while and on side evened out at 35.5 KG and the other event out at 964.4 which would suggest a loss of .6KG.

20180404205541_1.thumb.jpg.0ba544e97f2c6fd0e876ed2c28fec75e.jpg20180404205545_1.thumb.jpg.75814d2113170cfa691d47ffaf38e9b2.jpg

I then removed all doors and placed 3 new doors at the top of the base in sequence letting gas settle between each one. So we had the same number of open blocks. I had to give it a minute to settle out but it eventually landed at 500KG in each square.20180404205758_1.thumb.jpg.5ff4a929e88dda8c302b19ae4ad5720b.jpg

Just wanted to throw that out there in case it is helpful in discovery related to gas deletion. It may appear to be deletion but at times it may be rounding as well.

um....

22 minutes ago, lupineways said:

evened out at 35.5 KG and the other event out at 964.4

um thats a 0.1k difference

and that is a very real rounding effect but not the actual real values in the room because if you were to view them down to the gram level and add those numbers you would probably still get your 500k avg

28 minutes ago, Kabrute said:

um....

um thats a 0.1k difference

and that is a very real rounding effect but not the actual real values in the room because if you were to view them down to the gram level and add those numbers you would probably still get your 500k avg

Still, that doesn't change that OP's design shouldn't normally lead to, and more importantly wasn't meant to cause gas deletion.

Can'tbreathe is just being an ass. Moon is right eitherway, any loss that is occurring isn't intended by the design, and is of an inconsequential amount.

10 minutes ago, Logicsol said:

Still, that doesn't change that OP's design shouldn't normally lead to, and more importantly wasn't meant to cause gas deletion.

Can'tbreathe is just being an ass. Moon is right eitherway, any loss that is occurring isn't intended by the design, and is of an inconsequential amount.

You either can't read or are ignoring context. 

Again consequence is relative, your feelings are irrelevant. 

Just now, CantBreathe said:

You either can't read or are ignoring context. 

Again consequence is relative, your feelings are irrelevant. 

You uh, sure about that?

 

 

10 hours ago, CantBreathe said:

Not using drip cooling glitches or using metal doors to compress or destroy materials, that's for sure.

 

10 hours ago, CantBreathe said:

You are using doors to crush gas into oblivion to create vacuums. You haven't really built anything here.

That's both an implied accusation, and a direct one. Your intent is obvious. 

Regardless the important bit is that isn't not meant to delete gas, and if it does, the amount is in the realm of  a seconds worth of run time for an NG Gen.

5 minutes ago, Logicsol said:

You uh, sure about that?

That's both an implied accusation, and a direct one. Your intent is obvious. 

Regardless the important bit is that isn't not meant to delete gas, and if it does, the amount is in the realm of  a seconds worth of run time for an NG Gen.

-Yes, I'm sure about that.

-I did make the accusation, after my statement about how I (myself) play the game was perceived accusatory.

-Seconds add to minutes to hours, the value and perception of time (and space) are relative to the observer.

-I stated many times that I don't care at all how he plays the game, we aren't friends or even acquaintances. 

Actually I never even stated that the loss wasn't a rounding error, only that there was practical loss and he was ignoring data to prove a point.

Honestly no one but us few care, and that is of little consequence.

 

1 hour ago, CantBreathe said:

-Yes, I'm sure about that.

-I did make the accusation, after my statement about how I (myself) play the game was perceived accusatory.

 

Gee, do you think that might be what people are talking about? You know, since it's the 2nd reply in the topic.

 

Quote

-Seconds add to minutes to hours, the value and perception of time (and space) are relative to the observer.

It's a 1 cycle loss of NG power every ~600 cycles, there isn't really a time scale where that will be noticeable, especially with the advent of Smart batteries.

 

Quote

-I stated many times that I don't care at all how he plays the game, we aren't friends or even acquaintances. 

Actually I never even stated that the loss wasn't a rounding error, only that there was practical loss and he was ignoring data to prove a point.

Honestly no one but us few care, and that is of little consequence.

That's not how you come across. 

 

@Kabrute fair enough.

well i did a test run since the response on my last comment. here are the files take of it what you want to see value of the gasses  just delete the top not when the top right door is closed results were interesting.... have fun

start test.sav

test 1 C 16.sav

test 1 C 137.sav

test 1 c 301.sav

test 1 C54.sav

22 hours ago, Priitm said:

Nullifer keeps up just fine ~60C output gas.

I like low tech easy to build in survival AND I just happen to have an AETN sitting right above magma in my base, was wondering what the heck, but this looks perfect for that.   what are the settings on your automation sensors?  thanks for posting.

15 hours ago, Kabrute said:

um....

um thats a 0.1k difference

and that is a very real rounding effect but not the actual real values in the room because if you were to view them down to the gram level and add those numbers you would probably still get your 500k avg

Not to belabor the point but that is .1 rounded for the one tile but overall it is .6. (35.5 x 6 + 964.4 * 6)  = 5999.4. Every tile on one side did in fact have 35.5 kg when you hover over, while every tile on the other side had 964.4kg. Maybe I could have been clearer. but that is a total of .6 grams off due to rounding.

1 hour ago, Denisetwin said:

I like low tech easy to build in survival AND I just happen to have an AETN sitting right above magma in my base, was wondering what the heck, but this looks perfect for that.   what are the settings on your automation sensors?  thanks for posting.

just one sensor to close the door if there is more than 5kg oil on the heating plate, so it lets heat pass only if there is something to heat.

oil flow is set 240g/s just enough for 4 generators - seems optimal with that volcano. and two "safety" sensors to stop oil flow, one stops flow if there is more than 50 kg oil on the heating plate (stops the system if heat should run out in dormate phase) and second sensor is set to stop oil flow when there is more that 5 kg nat gas pressure.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.

×
  • Create New...