Oni Noob Posted October 13, 2018 Share Posted October 13, 2018 Is creating multiple Space Scanner really important? I am not sure whats the benefits of adding multple scanner and connecting them together Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitroturtle Posted October 13, 2018 Share Posted October 13, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oni Noob Posted October 14, 2018 Author Share Posted October 14, 2018 So the only difference is the accuracy when will the meteor will strike? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasza22 Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 Iirc if you want to be sure you gt a 200s warning you need 100% scanner coverage. Otherwise you will get warning randomly between 200s and the minimal amount based on how amny scanners you have and their quality. In theory even a fully blocked scanner can give you a warning in time but it might as well send the signal 1s before the meteor hits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gwido Posted November 2, 2018 Share Posted November 2, 2018 I always place 4 scanners in a compact row, just under my bunker shield, and it's enough to detect meteor showers a long time before it arrives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fischer_L Posted November 2, 2018 Share Posted November 2, 2018 The thing is - more warning time you have before meteor shower - later you can close bunker's door - more power you gain from a solar array. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToiDiaeRaRIsuOy Posted November 2, 2018 Share Posted November 2, 2018 2 hours ago, Fischer_L said: The thing is - more warning time you have before meteor shower - later you can close bunker's door - more power you gain from a solar array. I feel there is a trade off somewhere in there because space scanners continually consume power Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhailRaptor Posted November 2, 2018 Share Posted November 2, 2018 44 minutes ago, ToiDiaeRaRIsuOy said: I feel there is a trade off somewhere in there because space scanners continually consume power Very little compared to the output of even a small Solar array. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToiDiaeRaRIsuOy Posted November 2, 2018 Share Posted November 2, 2018 23 minutes ago, PhailRaptor said: Very little compared to the output of even a small Solar array. The big issue is when the meteors are coming down. Although you could automate to shut off power to all scanners bar one. If I am correct, the scanners immediately pick up when the shower is overw regardless of scan/network quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasza22 Posted November 2, 2018 Share Posted November 2, 2018 2 hours ago, ToiDiaeRaRIsuOy said: The big issue is when the meteors are coming down. Although you could automate to shut off power to all scanners bar one. If I am correct, the scanners immediately pick up when the shower is overw regardless of scan/network quality. With 100% coverage you can shut down the scanners except one at the first meteor detection and shut the doors after ~160s so they close in time. Just keep in mind that the one scanner might not pickup meteors after you tyrn all others and before the rain starts off so you need your automation to account for that with buffers and filters. After the scanner stops detecting meteors you can take ~40s before turning on the others as they are useless before the doors open anyways. That`s when you want optimal power effciency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturnus Posted November 2, 2018 Share Posted November 2, 2018 My observations, which naturally could be wrong, is that even though breaks are said to be 300-1200 seconds long, it's actually only partly true. Meteor shows seem to always start at exactly quarter cycle intervals which means scanners in principle only needs to be on for less than 10% of the time to give you exactly the same accuracy as having them on all the time. If you string together 4 clock sensors to turn on the scanner array and set them at 24%, 49%, 74%, and 99%. Each with a 2% duration. You should see the same accuracy as a scanner array that is constantly on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.