Jump to content
Rotwood Early Access is Available Now!

Benchmark Testing of Spaced out

JohnFrancis

Recommended Posts

EnduringDev

EnduringDev

Posted
Posted

Time : 5:08 to go 600 seconds at regular speed, 1:57 at max speed
CPU : i9-9900k @ 4.9 all core Ghz
Graphics card : 3090 Kingpin Edition
RAM : 4 sticks of G.Skill 8192 MB (DDR4-3800) - XMP 2.0 - P/N: F4-3800C14-8GTZN
CAS : 14-16-16-36
HDD : ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB 3D NAND NVMe Gen3x4 PCIe M.2 2280

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kerdeld

Kerdeld

Posted
Posted

Time : 1:46 or 106 seconds
CPU :  AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor @4.75GHz
Graphics card : GTX 1660 TI
RAM : 32 GB DDR4 3733 Mhz 

CAS :  16 16 16 28 42 290 (Trfc) Command Rate 1 
HDD : SSD Samsung 970 Evo M.2 1TB

Note: I have overclocked my CPU / Ram / GPU (which has no effect on this benchmark)

I have adjusted every overclock in detail and spends weeks on some things and finding more information and testing everything.

Let me know if anyone need more information, this is pretty bare since a lot of factors count in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Domkeykong

Domkeykong

Posted
Posted

Time : 3:04 (184 sec) 3:03 (183 sec) (with libgamemode: 3:00 (180 sec) 3:06 (180 sec))
CPU : AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Six-Core Processor
Graphics card :  Radeon RX 580 Series8G (saphire)
RAM : 2x8GB G.Skill Aegis DDR4-3000 DIMM (16GB)

CAS : CL16, 18, 18, 38 (F4-3000C16-8GISB)
SSD: 
    OS (and savefile): Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB (sata)
    Game: Samsung SSD 850 Evo 250GB (M.2 NVME)

Additional info:
I'm running Pop!_OS 21.04 with KDE desktop environment
libgamemode improved load times by around 15 second (2:20 --> 2:05), runtime wasn't affected but i guess that would change with more programs running (thinking of OBS)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SafPlusPlus

SafPlusPlus

Posted
Posted

Not too shabby for an passively cooled non-gaming laptop which doesn't even have an Intel or AMD CPU... :)

Time : 2:40.66 (so 160.66 sec)
CPU : Apple M1
Graphics card : Apple M1 (so intergrated graphics)
RAM : 16 GB LPDDR4

CAS : What ever Apple has deemed appropriate for this lil'ol Macbook Air :)
HDD : 500GB Apple SSD

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Noji

Noji

Posted
Posted

Have a 6.5 year old PC, but figured I'd post as a reference point for last-last-gen hardware.

 

Time : 2:40.83 (~160 sec)
CPU : i5-4690K CPU @ 3.57 GHz
Graphics card : GTX970
RAM : 2x4 GB DDR3 2448 MHz

CAS : 11,13,13,31
HDD : SSD 850 Evo 250G

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vitakaninen

Vitakaninen

Posted
Posted

Time (Test 1) : 2:31 or 151 secs Before changing Over-clocking in bios
Time (Test 2) : 2:24 or 144 secs Before changing Over-clocking in bios
Time (Test 3) : 2:21 or 141 secs After changing Over-clocking in bios
Time (Test 4) : 2:30 or 150 secs After changing Over-clocking in bios
Time (Test 5) : 2:50 or 170 secs After changing Over-clocking in bios
Time (Test 6) : 2:34 or 154 secs After changing Over-clocking in bios

Computer Type: Alienware m 17 R3 Laptop

CPU Before Over-Clocking:

    Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10980HK CPU @ 2.40GHz
    Base speed:    3.10 GHz
    Cores:    8
    Logical processors:    16
    L1 cache:    512 KB
    L2 cache:    2.0 MB
    L3 cache:    16.0 MB
    Speed    4.33 GHz
    
CPU After Over-Clocking:

    Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10980HK CPU @ 2.40GHz
    Base speed:    3.10 GHz
    Cores:    8
    Logical processors:    16
    L1 cache:    512 KB
    L2 cache:    2.0 MB
    L3 cache:    16.0 MB
    Speed    4.88 GHz

Graphics card :

    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
    Dedicated GPU memory    4.2/8.0 GB
    Shared GPU memory    0.5/15.9 GB
    GPU Memory    4.7/23.9 GB

RAM : 32GB DDR4 2666MHz

    Speed:    2667 MHz
    Slots used:    2 of 2

CAS : I think the info below means 19,19,19,43?

    CAS # Latency (CL): 19.0 clocks
    RAS # to CAS # Delay (tRCD): 19 clocks
    RAS # Precharge (tRP): 19 clocks
    Cycle Time (tRAS): 43 clocks
    Row Refresh Cycle Time (tRFC): 734 clocks
    Command Rate (CR): 2T
    
HDD :

    2TB (2x 1TB PCIe M.2 SSD) RAID 0 [Boot] + 512GB PCIe M.2 SSD [Storage]

    Disk 1 (C:)
    Intel Raid 0 Volume
    Capacity:    1.9 TB
    Formatted:    1.9 TB
    System disk:    Yes
    Page file:    Yes
    Type:    SSD

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gabberworld

gabberworld

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Kerdeld said:

Time : 1:46 or 106 seconds
CPU :  AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor @4.75GHz
Graphics card : GTX 1660 TI
RAM : 32 GB DDR4 3733 Mhz 

CAS :  16 16 16 28 42 290 (Trfc) Command Rate 1 
HDD : SSD Samsung 970 Evo M.2 1TB

Note: I have overclocked my CPU / Ram / GPU (which has no effect on this benchmark)

I have adjusted every overclock in detail and spends weeks on some things and finding more information and testing everything.

Let me know if anyone need more information, this is pretty bare since a lot of factors count in.

that is almost prefect result as 100 sec is possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lautasdf

lautasdf

Posted
Posted

Time : 1:52 (112 sec)
CPU : Ryzen 5900X @ 4.4GHz
Graphics card : Sapphire Radeon RX 5700XT SE
RAM : 32GB (2x16GB) G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4 3600MHz F4-3600C19-16GTRS

CAS : 20-20-20-40

Storage : Kingston SA400S37480G (install media)
Storage : Samsung 970 EVO NVMe 1TB (system drive)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
maladendron

maladendron

Posted
Posted

Everyone loves a good benchmark:

Time : 130.01 seconds (2:10.01)
CPU : Intel i7 9700 at 4.9GHz (all core)
Graphics card : RTX 2080Ti
RAM : 32GB @ 3200MHz

CAS : 16-18-18-38
HDD :  Game is on a Samsung SSD 970 (NVMe), save file is on an 860 EVO (SATA)

I was surprised, but I suppose not in retrospect, the effect that RAM gubbins had on the results.

attached: lol @ ram use

Capture.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RuiPalhas

RuiPalhas

Posted
Posted

 

3 hours ago, JohnFrancis said:

I am shocked by that result, the i9 9980XE is more of a workstation CPU but still I though it would be much closer to my results. It took your system 55% longer to do 300 in game seconds. Only thing I can see that might be hurting your times is the spindle drives, that is the only explanation I can think off.

Yeah, this CPU doesn't seem to be very good for single core type applications compared with others

3 hours ago, gabberworld said:

DDR4 2666 MHz, your memory is like 400 mhz faster its very big number

The memory speed should definitely play a role in this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gabberworld

gabberworld

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, RuiPalhas said:

 

Yeah, this CPU doesn't seem to be very good for single core type applications compared with others

The memory speed should definitely play a role in this!

i not know what motherboard he have but he could speed up with "X299X AORUS MASTER" atleast up to 4333 mhz

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Domkeykong

Domkeykong

Posted
Posted

I did another test with XMP enabled (and libgamemode):

Time : 2:47 (167 sec) 2:47 (167 sec)
CPU : AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Six-Core Processor
Graphics card :  Radeon RX 580 Series8G (saphire)
RAM : 2x8GB G.Skill Aegis DDR4-3000 DIMM (16GB)

CAS : CL16, 18, 18, 38 (F4-3000C16-8GISB)
SSD: 
    OS (and savefile): Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB (sata)
    Game: Samsung SSD 850 Evo 250GB (M.2 NVME)

Additional info:
I'm running Pop!_OS 21.04 with KDE desktop environment
XMP did surprisingly improve times a bit! ONI might not be CPU bottlenecked but rather bandwidth bottlenecked similar to factorio as both games are base building sims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lautasdf

lautasdf

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, gabberworld said:

i not know what motherboard he have but he could speed up with "X299X AORUS MASTER" atleast up to 4333 mhz

I sincerely doubt that the motherboard is the single point of "speed up" possible, since the "up to" is more of an upper bound at which the RAM modules installed may run, not at which it will, since that is defined by the silicon in each module.

I suspect the performance hit, and main difference, comes from the configuration of the modules (physical slots populated, according to motherboard specs) and RAM speeds (which may or may not be graded to run at any higher, thus overclocking them, plus checking the timings at which it will run, when let's say it is set to 1800MHz DRAM freq.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chaosalligator

chaosalligator

Posted
Posted

Time : 2:31(151 seconds)
CPU : AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Graphics card : AMD Radeon RX 5700XT
RAM : 2667 16gb (complete garbage here) if i set memory profile in bios to 3200 with 16-18-18-36, time becomes 2:24(144), but it is kinda unstable

CAS : 16/18/18/39
ssd: GIGABYTE GP-GSM2NE3100TNTD

motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tracc

tracc

Posted
Posted

Time : 3:20:42

CPU :    Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz

   Graphics card :    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

RAM : 16 GB 1600 MHz

CAS :

HDD :    WDC  WDS100T2B0A-00SM50

I am shocked that some People are as slow as me. Also your Cycle 2k save runs better than my 1.5k file where I am only on 2 planets. That is not fair...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...