Ugato Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 Time : 2:42 (162 seconds) CPU : Intel Core i7-7700 CPU @3.6GHZ Graphics card : GTX 1060 3GB RAM : 16GB 2400MHz CAS : - HDD : Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB Forgot to include RAM speed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enceos Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 Time : 1:58 (118s) CPU : Intel 10900K (no OC) Graphics card : RTX 3090 (no OC) RAM : 128 GB 3500MHz CAS : 16-18-18-36 HDD : Regular SSD 500Mb/s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurgel Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 1 hour ago, gabberworld said: and still latest intel cpu is not bad at all. they even beat amd single core performance. amd only plus is that it have smaller cpu what allows have more cores. and thats is all. but if app is not designed to run in multi cores then in cant pump out maximum anyway from amd I think you do not understand what I am saying. Higher jitter means you need much higher FPS for a good experience. If you need 20FPS on AMD and 50 FPS on INTEL for a comparable experience, then Intel looses all supposed single-core advantages. Incidentally, this is not the only aspect in which Intel is inferior. FPS alone are a meaningless metric. Things are quite a bit more complicated. Or as the saying among experts goes: "lies, damned lies and benchmarks". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s0litaire Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 Running on Latest Development branch as on 27th September (U36-479858-5) I got the following time: Time : 4.09 (249 seconds) Running on main branch I got the following time: Time : 3:56 (236 seconds) Running on main branch (with D.O.C.P. on) I got the following time: Time : 2:24 (144 seconds) System specs : OS : Linux Ubuntu 21:04 CPU : AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 4.4Ghz Graphics card : AMD RX 590 running at 1080p RAM : 32Gb 2 x 16Gb DDR4 2133Mhz (default NO D.O.C.P.) CAS : 15-15-15-36 (D.O.C.P. off) RAM : 32Gb 2 x 16Gb DDR4 31000Mhz (With D.O.C.P. on) CAS : 16-20-20-38 (D.O.C.P. on) HDD : Corsair Force MP600 1Tb M.2 NVNe *EDIT* Note I'm an idiot! recently updated the BIOS and it reset a lot of my settings. Didn't notice DOCP wasn't on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morte-diem Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 Time : 1:56 (116s) CPU : Intel 10700KF (stock) Graphics card : RTX 3080 RAM : 32 GB 3600MHz (8GB x 4 slots) CAS : 16-18-18-38 HDD : Some M.2 NVME SSD +-1500 MB/S -Tested with 1080p and 1440p with the same result. ___________________________________________ Without restart and 5 hours of use: Time : 2:00 (120s) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazyfox55 Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 Time : 2:55 or 175 seconds CPU : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5820K CPU @ 3.30GHz Graphics card : RTX 2080 TI RAM : 16 GB DDR4 2400 MHz CAS : 15,15,15,35 HDD : Kingston V300 240 GB SV300S37A/240G 2 SSD @ Raid 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zalmaniac Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 33 minutes ago, Zalmaniac said: Time : 2:10 CPU : Ryzen 9 5900X Graphics card : GTX 780 RAM : 2x16GB DDR4 3200Mhz CAS : HDD : WD Black SN750 1TB M.2 I have an RTX 3060 TI being delivered in a day or 2 so I can post an update then to see if it makes a difference. Time was 1:56 once I enabled XMP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nepeo Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 Repeated it twice to get a consistent time. Anecdotally still get a lot of judder scrolling about, but I do play on an ultrawide so that might affect how much of the game is loading etc. Frame rate appears to be consistently above 60Hz and peaked at 144hz ( max for my panel ). According to CPUID HWMonitor my GPU didn't go above 60% usage, so definitely CPU bound. Time : 1:53 or 113 second CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 5900X Graphics card : NVIDEA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti RAM: 64 GB DDR4 3600 Mhz CAS : 18,22,22,38 SSD : Samsung SSD 980 PRO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raukgorth Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 I was hoping that somebody would post ~60 seconds results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zalmaniac Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 5 minutes ago, Raukgorth said: I was hoping that somebody would post ~60 seconds results. I believe the hard cap is 100 sec. Game is running at 3x speed and the timer is set to 300 sec. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enceos Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 6 minutes ago, Raukgorth said: I was hoping that somebody would post ~60 seconds results. It would be possible if the game was optimized to use more CPU cores. More than half of them are idling in ONI, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycic101 Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 All the best with your upgrade! Note, I also timed saving the game (just from the pause menu) in case that helps (hard drive performance I guess). Time : 1:59.6 (119.6 seconds) CPU : AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Graphics card : Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB RAM : 32GB Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR4 @3600MHz (2x16GB) CAS : 18-22-22-42 HDD : HP EX950 M.2 512GB PCI-e Gen3 x4 Saving time : 8.96 seconds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yevimen716 Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 Time : 185 (Ubuntu 20.4); 172 (Win10) CPU : AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Graphics card : RX580 RAM : 16GB DDR4 @ 3000MHz CAS : 15-17-17-35 HDD : 1TB NVMe (XPG SX8200) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s0litaire Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 7 minutes ago, Enceos said: It would be possible if the game was optimized to use more CPU cores. More than half of them are idling in ONI, But looks like faster ram gives better results. I dropped nearly 100 seconds between DOCP off and DOCP on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhtux Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 Time : 1m52s CPU : AMD 5900x Graphics card : 6900XT RAM : 64GB 3200MT/s (4x16G) CAS : 16-17-17-17-39 HDD : Ram drive Disclaimers: I run on Fedora34 (not windows). I use ram drive for save files Going to retry with 2x16G (the ram is mismatched brands & cas speeds, will post again if the time improves with my testing. Also going to try running the game with proton instead of natively on Linux.. see if that helps or hurts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gabberworld Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 34 minutes ago, Raukgorth said: I was hoping that somebody would post ~60 seconds results. 100 sec. not sure if its possible faster. if someone gets that result it would be prefect with this test Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mouzfun Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 Time : 123 CPU : i9900k @4.9 GHz (damn silicon lottery) Graphics card : RX590 RAM : 2x8GB DDR4 3200Mhz CAS : 18/22/22/42 HDD : Generic 6Gbit/s sata SSD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UltraIO Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 Here some more results: Time : 2:16:81 (136 seconds) CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 3900x 12-core Graphics card : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super RAM : 32 GB DDR4 3200 MHz CAS : 16, 18, 18, 36 HDD : Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnFrancis Posted September 27, 2021 Author Share Posted September 27, 2021 26 minutes ago, Zalmaniac said: Time was 1:56 once I enabled XMP. 10% performance increase just like me. Ouch, how long was XMP not enabled for? I totally knew XMP was a thing and enabled it straight away when I built my PC, no way I did not notice until I was building a new PC! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chestertrek Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 Time : 02:43 (163 seconds) CPU : i5 7600 @ 3.50GHz Graphics card : GTX 1060 3GB RAM : 16GB 2667MHz CAS : HDD : Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB Could be worse for a slightly ageing machine! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zorrzoor Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 Time : 2:11 or 131 seconds CPU : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz Graphics card : RTX 2060 RAM : 16 GB DDR4 3000 MHz CAS : 15,17,17,35 HDD : MX500 500 GB CT500MX500SSD1 Blank template you can copy and paste Time : 3:08 or 188 seconds CPU : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz Graphics card : GTX 1080ti RAM : 16GB DDR4 2133 (unsure about XPM, will check and re-do if needed) CAS : 13,15,15,28 HDD : Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB bought the DLC.. curiosity got me :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gabberworld Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 30 minutes ago, s0litaire said: But looks like faster ram gives better results. i been told that in this forum long time ago. the thing is modern cpus is faster than memory speed. cpu cant read that fast from memory the data what cpu is able work with prefect solution would be if memory speed is same like cpu speed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galdo Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 As I was writing up the results, I realized my RAM was running slower than I like, so two results are below after and before changing ram speeds. Time : 135 seconds CPU : R5 3600 Graphics card : GTX 980 RAM : 32GB @ 3600 MHZ CAS : 18-20-20-36 HDD : 960GB @ Sata 3 (Crucial CT960M500SSD) Time : 138 seconds CPU : R5 3600 Graphics card : GTX 980 RAM : 32GB @ 3200 MHZ CAS : 16-18-18-36 HDD : 960GB @ Sata 3 (Crucial CT960M500SSD) Some notes: I did a few passes, and had around 3 seconds of jitter in results, so the difference between these two is hard to be certain of. Background programs had minimal impact, as having chrome open playing music was inside the jitter window. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuberi Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 Ran the test without restarting but closed my memory hog browser Time : 2:05 / 125 seconds CPU : AMD 5600X Graphics card : 3060 Ti RAM : 16GB at 2800MHz (Two 8GB sticks) CAS : 16-18-18-32 HDD : 1TB Kingston A2000 NVMe SSD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zalmaniac Posted September 27, 2021 Share Posted September 27, 2021 32 minutes ago, JohnFrancis said: 10% performance increase just like me. Ouch, how long was XMP not enabled for? I totally knew XMP was a thing and enabled it straight away when I built my PC, no way I did not notice until I was building a new PC! The Mobo, CPU and RAM is only about 3 weeks old. So it hasn't been disabled for long. If it hadn't been for this benchmark it most likely would have stayed disabled forever. So thanks a lot for the info! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.