britecrawlers Posted November 11, 2018 Share Posted November 11, 2018 Or am I just really stoned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ucw Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 I don't know, but I really hope they do because that's awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rellimarual Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 On 11/11/2018 at 1:41 AM, britecrawlers said: Or am I just really stoned? Not unless Klei wants to be sued by Disney Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mygreensocks Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 BRILLIANT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicManICT Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 22 hours ago, Rellimarual said: Not unless Klei wants to be sued by Disney "Fair use" and all that... There's so much you can legally use and be fine in court. However, if you put a single bar from anything in a YouTube video, you get a takedown notice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rellimarual Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 1 hour ago, MagicManICT said: "Fair use" and all that... There's so much you can legally use and be fine in court. However, if you put a single bar from anything in a YouTube video, you get a takedown notice. It wouldn’t qualify as fair use in this case. And Disney is notoriously litigious when it comes to their IP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SinisterOctopus Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 It sounds like they're whistling the birdsong you hear in vanilla Don't Starve, just much less creepily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watermelen671 Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 On 11/12/2018 at 1:02 PM, Rellimarual said: Not unless Klei wants to be sued by Disney I mean, if it's less than 15 seconds they're fine. It's not like the courts can definitively say that Klei infringed on copyright from less than 15 seconds of audio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rellimarual Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 20 minutes ago, watermelen671 said: I mean, if it's less than 15 seconds they're fine. It's not like the courts can definitively say that Klei infringed on copyright from less than 15 seconds of audio. I realize you're just a kid, but it would be unfortunate if others saw this and somehow took it as a statement grounded in fact. There is no hard and fast fair use standard, and much of the risk depends on how the IP is used (in an amateur work distributed for free, or in a commercial work like Hamlet) and the interests of the rights holder. A rights holder who feels that they have a lot of IP that they must defend aggressively in every instance so as not to establish a precedent for fair use defenses (i.e., Disney, and their past behavior is evidence that they feel this way) can absolutely sue for infringement if the song is recognizably theirs, and 15 seconds is plenty long enough for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadlyBurned Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 On 11/11/2018 at 1:41 AM, britecrawlers said: Or am I just really stoned? I don't recommend this game with anything other than a clear head. I myself played my first game pretty inebriated and I almost turned the game off because everything looked like if Dr Seuss had an acid flashback. Also, I didn't even see a pigeon. I saw a strange dude who punched me in the face and ran off like the Hamburglar. But no pigeons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watermelen671 Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 16 minutes ago, Rellimarual said: I realize you're just a kid, but it would be unfortunate if others saw this and somehow took it as a statement grounded in fact. There is no hard and fast fair use standard, and much of the risk depends on how the IP is used (in an amateur work distributed for free, or in a commercial work like Hamlet) and the interests of the rights holder. A rights holder who feels that they have a lot of IP that they must defend aggressively in every instance so as not to establish a precedent for fair use defenses (i.e., Disney, and their past behavior is evidence that they feel this way) can absolutely sue for infringement if the song is recognizably theirs, and 15 seconds is plenty long enough for that. ...okay first of all, I'm not a kid. Second of all, I never claimed nor am a lawyer. Third of all DO YOU REALLY THINK PEOPLE ARE GOING TO TAKE LEGAL ADVICE FROM SOME YUTZ WHO USES FORUM WEAPONS WAY TOO MUCH ON THE INTERNET?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ucw Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 Just now, watermelen671 said: ...okay first of all, I'm not a kid. Second of all, I never claimed nor am a lawyer. Third of all DO YOU REALLY THINK PEOPLE ARE GOING TO TAKE LEGAL ADVICE FROM SOME YUTZ WHO USES FORUM WEAPONS WAY TOO MUCH ON THE INTERNET?! Actually, Watermelen, I had a legal question for you about this situation of mine... well, for a friend, anways... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watermelen671 Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 2 minutes ago, ucw said: Actually, Watermelen, I had a legal question for you about this situation of mine... well, for a friend, anways... Deny everything, destroy any and all evidence, and move to another country that won't extradite you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rellimarual Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 5 hours ago, watermelen671 said: ...okay first of all, I'm not a kid. Second of all, I never claimed nor am a lawyer. Third of all DO YOU REALLY THINK PEOPLE ARE GOING TO TAKE LEGAL ADVICE FROM SOME YUTZ WHO USES FORUM WEAPONS WAY TOO MUCH ON THE INTERNET?! Yeah, you're right that the source may not have much credibility in this case, but the incorrect belief that X number of seconds of a copyrighted song is "fair use" is actually pretty widespread and gets repeated a lot-- after all , you picked it up somewhere. People believe all kinds of bogus things when they see them repeated often enough online. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ucw Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 15 hours ago, Rellimarual said: People believe all kinds of bogus things when they see them repeated often enough online. There is so much truth to this I could cry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watermelen671 Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 On 11/14/2018 at 9:26 PM, Rellimarual said: Yeah, you're right that the source may not have much credibility in this case, but the incorrect belief that X number of seconds of a copyrighted song is "fair use" is actually pretty widespread and gets repeated a lot-- after all , you picked it up somewhere. People believe all kinds of bogus things when they see them repeated often enough online. When it is repeated by a credible source. Now buddy, do I HONESTLY look like a credible source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.