Beargers wander ability.

[DVGMedia]

Since walter is now able to send woby off screen and do tasks It made me wonder if the klei development team will be willing to reimplment Beargers unloaded behaviors.
Bearger is supposed to be able to wander the world looking for items to eat during autumn So im wondering since klei is working back into offscreen behaviors It made me think of this.

What do you guys think of a wandering bearger.

[Well-met]

Would be cool

[Echsrick]

not interested

[Civecilim]

You mean like a bearger that is constantly blowing up the world without you knowing or being able to do anything about it (even moreso than the currently existing bearger)?

[Mysterious box]

If it's just food disappearing over time if you leave him alive that would be interesting or perhaps mobs becoming hostile as bearger removes their food supplies. I assume what it means is not background destruction.

[Auth]

40 minutes ago, Echsrick said:

not interested

Why?

[Cassielu]

Bearger's wandering is one of the coolest creature behaviors in the game, and it's a shame that it barely works due to loading area things.

Please make it happen

[somethin]

Great, now I'm going to be missing him when he spawn evn MORE than before. They really need to crank up his spawn warning growl if you want this change.

[-Variant]

Yes, please!! I'd love this, especially its if more focused on the food aspect over the destruction.

[YouKnowWho142]

Somewhat mixed, I think it would help to make bearger more interesting as a mob but it also sounds like it could be annoying. Not to mention that it sets the precedent that there would have to be activity around the bearger too, as he would probably be spawning treeguards and attacking beehives. Sounds like that could have a performance impact as well. It does sound really cool though.

[Anis5240]

no thanks, I prefer to leave him at where I want and when I go back there he's still there

[Kacpert25]

No, I would prefer to leave Bearger at one point on the map and have a peaceful autumns. If he wandered off screen, he could sooner or later reach areas surrounded by the player's structures.

[Peasant]

GET OFF FROM MY FRIDGE YOU FILTHY GIANT FUR BALL

[Steorra]

I would worry about my CPU.

[DVGMedia]

7 hours ago, Anis5240 said:

no thanks, I prefer to leave him at where I want and when I go back there he's still there

 

2 hours ago, Kacpert25 said:

No, I would prefer to leave Bearger at one point on the map and have a peaceful autumns. If he wandered off screen, he could sooner or later reach areas surrounded by the player's structures.

I think it would be kind of important though because then he would be back to being an actual threat to the players
Instead of just being a glorified tree chopper.

[Anis5240]

6 minutes ago, DVGMedia said:

think it would be kind of important though because then he would be back to being an actual threat to the players

look man, spiders getting up to tier 3 dens by just day 11 OFFSCREEN is already cringe ass. we don't need a hulking bear ruining the world where said destruction is NOT needed.

[Kacpert25]

32 minutes ago, DVGMedia said:

I think it would be kind of important though because then he would be back to being an actual threat to the players
Instead of just being a glorified tree chopper.

That's probably true, but I personally prefer to have peace in the endgame world rather than the constant threat. Hounds and Deerclops are enough for me, I don't need Bearger for that yet.

[Echsrick]

11 hours ago, Auth said:

Why?

because i dont want him to destroy base off screen

[Mojmaowo]

Why is this in the beta chat?

This is off topic

Also this would be actively bad because lunar rifts aren't active 24/7 and you need to wait for them to spawn to kill bearger

Unlike deerclops and warg which you can spawn manually