Dalek Posted December 3, 2018 Share Posted December 3, 2018 Guys, guys, GUYS. I just realized something. We all know, that all playable characters names start with W, right? Except Maxwell, who actually is William, but turning W in his name upside down made him mad and evil. But what if turning W to M actually gives the character royalty and power? We have Maxwell, we have queen Metheus, we have Mumsy, who is some kind of “in charge” of Gorge village or whatever it is. But guess what changed when Hamlet came out? We now have queen MALFALFA. So, now we have 3 royal characters and 1 some-kind-of-royal (or may be EX-royal?) character in the lore, and all their names start with M. The only character who doesn’t fit in this theory is Charlie, but may be it’s her second name or something like that? Also, in case if this theory actually is right, then letter, or, I guess, symbol of W means something like working class, even proletariat or just simple people. Let me know, what do you think about that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxposting Posted December 3, 2018 Share Posted December 3, 2018 Mumsy is just a mom who survives the aporkalypse with billy. aporkalypse in elder bog caused by gnaw , not random shadows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dalek Posted December 3, 2018 Author Share Posted December 3, 2018 1 minute ago, __IvoCZE__ said: Mumsy is just a mom who survives the aporkalypse with billy. aporkalypse in elder bog caused by gnaw , not random shadows but there no goats in hamlet, and aporkalypse is obviously connected with shadows cuz of herald summoning nightmares gnaw is something more like an lovecraftian god idk, but it’s something totally different Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tanshu Posted December 4, 2018 Share Posted December 4, 2018 M is for mini. W is for wumbo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOT Tuja Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 Battlemaster Pugna Doesn't really fit into this theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remps Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 18 hours ago, BOT Tuja said: Battlemaster Pugna Doesn't really fit into this theory. but we dont know pugna is guilty ? because he told we dont give bakc throne to shadows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dalek Posted January 17, 2019 Author Share Posted January 17, 2019 On 09.12.2018 at 9:37 PM, BOT Tuja said: Battlemaster Pugna Doesn't really fit into this theory. He’s a battlemaster, not a royal person. He’s just an officer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.