Cipupec2 Posted September 11, 2018 Share Posted September 11, 2018 A simple T splitter which splits the packets 50% 50%, as result each split line gets has half the flow. The problem is that if one if lines backed up, packets continue the other way still at half the speed, which backs up the main line. Further this issues doesn't seem to happen when using a bridge, but with just a bridge you can't setup priorities. How does other people handle this in big base network? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glassyfo Posted September 11, 2018 Share Posted September 11, 2018 If you're trying to use bridges to eliminate the delay from choosing a junction, just extend the pipe one section from the beginning of one bridge and then add a second bridge. I don't think it's quite possible to have no delay without bridge priorities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azunai333 Posted September 11, 2018 Share Posted September 11, 2018 With this you can have full output if one pipe is blocked: Works 4-way, too: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cipupec2 Posted September 11, 2018 Author Share Posted September 11, 2018 useful trick, thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cipupec2 Posted September 12, 2018 Author Share Posted September 12, 2018 Btw is there any trick to do the opposite i.e. to have a pipe merge into a mainline only to fill up the gaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoned Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 Yes just connect the auxiliary line with a bridge to the main line. It fills the packages then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cipupec2 Posted September 12, 2018 Author Share Posted September 12, 2018 The magic bridge for the rescue again ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heckubis Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 19 hours ago, Cipupec2 said: A simple T splitter which splits the packets 50% 50%, as result each split line gets has half the flow. The problem is that if one if lines backed up, packets continue the other way still at half the speed, which backs up the main line. Further this issues doesn't seem to happen when using a bridge, but with just a bridge you can't setup priorities. How does other people handle this in big base network? a valve would not have caused the 1 block gaps creating a backlog of content. just like the bridge set up the valve on the main line not on the branch line. the t intersection without use of bridge or valve will always calculate the line changes even if they are full causing 50% reduction in flow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasza22 Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 Helpful thread: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.