Jump to content

Do you automate your NG power plant or leave it on?


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Tobruk said:

Is it worth it to automate the NG power plant so that it only turns on if batteries are depleted or is it just a waste of refined metal?

Do you mean the NG's with tune ups? Yes that'd be a waste as you'd want to have the tuned up generators working flat out. But better yet, check if you can run your system without the tune ups. If you can, you should not do tune ups.

15 minutes ago, Tobruk said:

Is it worth it to automate the NG power plant so that it only turns on if batteries are depleted or is it just a waste of refined metal?

I would argue that it would depend on what your power draw looks like. If its an inconsistent draw then it might be worth conserving some natural gas for when your system experiences a power spike. This means you could potentially have a few more natural gas generators as well.


But if your system pulls a constant amount of energy then it might not be worth the effort of automating it. 

I leave mine running 24/7 until the supply of gas runs low and then it switches, but I have my base running at near enough a net 0 power gain, During the day the batteries get drained slowly, and during the night they charge slowly. 

Like Hanro said, it depends on what the draw looks like.

16 minutes ago, turbonl64 said:

Do you mean the NG's with tune ups? Yes that'd be a waste as you'd want to have the tuned up generators working flat out. But better yet, check if you can run your system without the tune ups. If you can, you should not do tune ups.

No, I meant connecting it to your main smart battery storage. This way it only kicks in if there is little power left.

17 minutes ago, Hanro50 said:

I would argue that it would depend on what your power draw looks like. If its an inconsistent draw then it might be worth conserving some natural gas for when your system experiences a power spike. This means you could potentially have a few more natural gas generators as well.


But if your system pulls a constant amount of energy then it might not be worth the effort of automating it. 

But what about heat? Leaving it on means constant heat production that builds up over time.

2 minutes ago, Tobruk said:

No, I meant connecting it to your main smart battery storage. This way it only kicks in if there is little power left.

But what about heat? Leaving it on means constant heat production that builds up over time.

Who builds a power-plant near there meal-wood food patch?

I've built natural gas generators in hot subworlds before and unless you plan to keep them in a vacuum they don't tend to become to toasty.  

7 minutes ago, Tobruk said:

No, I meant connecting it to your main smart battery storage. This way it only kicks in if there is little power left.

But what about heat? Leaving it on means constant heat production that builds up over time.

Well than it indeed depends how much power waste you have. If it is overall small compared to the total amount of jouls produced, than you should not bother with it.

Also mind batteries now loose power over time. There is literally a break even point.

I hae had mine running for about 200 cycles, the CO2 in the room is getting hotter and absorbing the heat well enough but it has yet to reach 71 degrees, My machines are made out of iron, But in the event that they get closer I would just inject super cooled Carbon Dioxide and let the slicksters eat the hot stuff.

BlueLance, if you cool the Nat Gas before it goes into the generator, that affects what the output temp is of it.  If you feed -50C Nat Gas into it, it will output the CO2 at the same temp, and the PW at just above it's freezing point.

34 minutes ago, Steelflame said:

BlueLance, if you cool the Nat Gas before it goes into the generator, that affects what the output temp is of it.  If you feed -50C Nat Gas into it, it will output the CO2 at the same temp, and the PW at just above it's freezing point.

I think the output of the Natural Gas Generators is dependent on what temperature the generator is itself rather than the temperature of the input

I build these generators near nullifers will allow them to instantly expel Polluted Ice and very cold CO2. You can then put the output of the CO2 directly over a Nullifer (which usually results in the CO2 freezing). 

-50 is about the limit otherwise the CO2 can instantly condense in the pipe causing breakages.

15 hours ago, Steelflame said:

BlueLance, if you cool the Nat Gas before it goes into the generator, that affects what the output temp is of it.  If you feed -50C Nat Gas into it, it will output the CO2 at the same temp, and the PW at just above it's freezing point.

Ahh that I didnt know, but I never cool down my gas storage, I do have an experiment going though to liquify excess Nat Gas since it can store much more per tile.

But otherwise I never usually cool the area, I even have my Polymer Press in there

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.

×
  • Create New...