[Art Suggestion] the leg of wriggly eyebrella should be waving

[dish-order man]

just found out the new drop is an eyebrella of Millipede or Worm or something. i strongly suggest the leg should be waving in order to be likely wear a living worm on head.  the Effect Sound of wearing should be a  kind of sound when insects crawling.

@JoeW

i modify the animation of this eyebrella by AI to show its final Manuscript:(please ignore the eye moving around)

Spoiler

 

 

Spoiler

 

 

 

[Cassielu]

Unfortunately its technically impossible for current skin mechanism. You can't make a stationary part move.

Edited March 19 by Cassielu

[gaymime]

please don't bring slop into the forums, it's super cringe. you can put forth your thoughts just fine without sinking to that level.

[Cheggf]

Why are people always pinging devs for no reason?

[Frosty_Mentos]

1 hour ago, gaymime said:

please don't bring slop into the forums, it's super cringe. you can put forth your thoughts just fine without sinking to that level.

Let's not hate on the person for posting a suggestion with it, it's mild at best. Also wastes money for big tech hehehe

[Jakepeng99]

2 hours ago, Frosty_Mentos said:

Let's not hate on the person for posting a suggestion with it, it's mild at best. Also wastes money for big tech hehehe

Also takes water from people in areas with drouts and pollutes water systems.

[dish-order man]

9 hours ago, gaymime said:

please don't bring slop into the forums, it's super cringe. you can put forth your thoughts just fine without sinking to that level.

i would apologize for any offensive words, but i checked out my vocabulary and found nothing impolite, what i say is all about insect and the hat. could you please kindly point out which words would cause that misunderstand?

7 hours ago, Frosty_Mentos said:

Let's not hate on the person for posting a suggestion with it, it's mild at best. Also wastes money for big tech hehehe

thank you. i am not a english native and even have no awareness of which word is slop after being pointed out. it is a pity misunderstood occurred

[gaymime]

5 hours ago, dish-order man said:

i would apologize for any offensive words, but i checked out my vocabulary and found nothing impolite, what i say is all about insect and the hat. could you please kindly point out which words would cause that misunderstand?

thank you. i am not a english native and even have no awareness of which word is slop after being pointed out. it is a pity misunderstood occurred

your words were fine. slop is the colloquial term for the image you generated. this is the name for it both because of how it is made(by slopping) and how many people feel about it being made(it is slop quality and value).

my upset, and the upset others are having comes from ai image-editing being unethical and ecologically damaging. it consumes great quantities of necessary resources while not creating anything new. your image used roughly about as much drinking water as my whole household uses in 3 days. the water used is usually(though not always) contaminated to the point of no longer being potable. i could charge my phone about 2 times from empty plus a little extra with the same amount of energy it used. i used to make art as my job and you could have commissioned me(a live human person) to hand-animate that image for roughly the same cost as using ai to do it. the image you put into the databank the generator uses(art created by klei) is now part of the databank and will be used to make future images without the consent of klei. finally the cost of all of this is not taken on by the corporations and companies that are providing it; it is taken on by the local communities where the centres are located as much of this is subsidised by local governments as generative ai itself does not generate profit.

Edited March 20 by gaymime

[dish-order man]

35 minutes ago, gaymime said:

your words were fine. slop is the colloquial term for the image you generated. this is the name for it both because of how it is made(by slopping) and how many people feel about it being made(it is slop quality and value).

got it. i dont really know what is about slop before. earlier my translator told me that i used a F word or something. 

so far i got your opinion, but i totally disagree with your opinion except the copyright of klei content. but it's no need to argue about this cause i just come to put on a suggestion. and unfortunately i would bring more these slops if i need.

[Jakepeng99]

On 3/20/2026 at 10:30 AM, dish-order man said:

got it. i dont really know what is about slop before. earlier my translator told me that i used a F word or something. 

so far i got your opinion, but i totally disagree with your opinion except the copyright of klei content. but it's no need to argue about this cause i just come to put on a suggestion. and unfortunately i would bring more these slops if i need.

Poor people in both third world and first world countries have to drink dirty water and experience noise and air pollution because of the Ai companies, and pro Ai people like you.

[astroapyr]

I like the 2nd example better, might not be applied, but hey, looks good to me.

[dish-order man]

On 3/27/2026 at 4:26 PM, Jakepeng99 said:

Poor people in both third world and first world countries have to drink dirty water and experience noise and air pollution because of the Ai companies

Some claim that the poverty faced by people in the Third World is caused by “AI companies.” This assertion is not only factually inaccurate but also dangerously misleading. It confuses the symptoms of a deep-rooted structural crisis with its true cause. In reality, the enduring economic hardship in the Third World stems not from artificial intelligence or multinational tech corporations, but from centuries of colonial oppression and the structurally unjust global trade system established and dominated by wealthy, industrialized nations.

Beginning in the 15th century, European colonial powers used military conquest, forced labor, and systemic exploitation to turn vast regions of Africa, Asia, and Latin America into resource colonies. They extracted gold, ivory, timber, cotton, rubber, and minerals through brutal means, while dismantling local industries and economies. Traditional crafts and manufacturing were suppressed, replaced by a one-sided export model that funneled raw materials to Europe while forcing Third World populations to import finished goods. This created a lasting pattern of economic dependence, weakening sovereignty and stunting industrial development—consequences that persist well into the 21st century.

Even after formal decolonization, the legacy of this exploitative order remained embedded in the post–World War II international system. Institutions such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the World Trade Organization (WTO) were shaped primarily by Western governments, favoring the interests of the developed countries over the developing countries. Despite the rhetoric of “free trade,” these structures perpetuated inequality. Wealthy nations continue to subsidize their own agriculture—such as U.S. wheat and EU dairy—making it nearly impossible for small farmers in the Third World to compete fairly. At the same time, strict patent laws and intellectual property regimes block access to essential technologies, including affordable medicines, clean energy innovations, and digital infrastructure, all critical for development.

Furthermore, IMF-imposed structural adjustment programs (SAPs) forced many Third World countries to slash public spending, privatize state assets, and open markets—policies that weakened healthcare, education, and social protection, exacerbating inequality and deepening poverty.

AI companies, though based in the developed countries, are not the cause of these inequalities. They are a product of a system where capital, data, and technological innovation are concentrated in the hands of a few. These companies depend on labor, raw materials, and digital data—often extracted from the Third World—yet benefit disproportionately from a global architecture that rewards power, not fairness.

Blaming AI is a diversion. The real issue lies in accountability: who sets the rules? Who profits? Who bears the cost? The Third World’s crisis is not the result of a single technology—it is the outcome of centuries of exploitation and an international system that still privileges the powerful.

To build a just world, we must confront the colonial past and dismantle the unfair trade, financial, and technological orders that continue to marginalize the Third World. We must demand equitable access to knowledge, fair trade terms, and the end of structural domination—not scapegoat emerging technologies for a crisis they did not create.

Truthful discourse begins with acknowledging the past and demanding systemic change. Only then can development truly be inclusive and equal.

On 3/27/2026 at 4:26 PM, Jakepeng99 said:

pro Ai people

i like that name ty. BTW how do you like the AI response generated in 10 seconds? i would produce more 10-sec-answers for you if u like

[Jakepeng99]

18 minutes ago, dish-order man said:

Some claim that the poverty faced by people in the Third World is caused by “AI companies.” This assertion is not only factually inaccurate but also dangerously misleading. It confuses the symptoms of a deep-rooted structural crisis with its true cause. In reality, the enduring economic hardship in the Third World stems not from artificial intelligence or multinational tech corporations, but from centuries of colonial oppression and the structurally unjust global trade system established and dominated by wealthy, industrialized nations.

Beginning in the 15th century, European colonial powers used military conquest, forced labor, and systemic exploitation to turn vast regions of Africa, Asia, and Latin America into resource colonies. They extracted gold, ivory, timber, cotton, rubber, and minerals through brutal means, while dismantling local industries and economies. Traditional crafts and manufacturing were suppressed, replaced by a one-sided export model that funneled raw materials to Europe while forcing Third World populations to import finished goods. This created a lasting pattern of economic dependence, weakening sovereignty and stunting industrial development—consequences that persist well into the 21st century.

Even after formal decolonization, the legacy of this exploitative order remained embedded in the post–World War II international system. Institutions such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the World Trade Organization (WTO) were shaped primarily by Western governments, favoring the interests of the developed countries over the developing countries. Despite the rhetoric of “free trade,” these structures perpetuated inequality. Wealthy nations continue to subsidize their own agriculture—such as U.S. wheat and EU dairy—making it nearly impossible for small farmers in the Third World to compete fairly. At the same time, strict patent laws and intellectual property regimes block access to essential technologies, including affordable medicines, clean energy innovations, and digital infrastructure, all critical for development.

Furthermore, IMF-imposed structural adjustment programs (SAPs) forced many Third World countries to slash public spending, privatize state assets, and open markets—policies that weakened healthcare, education, and social protection, exacerbating inequality and deepening poverty.

AI companies, though based in the developed countries, are not the cause of these inequalities. They are a product of a system where capital, data, and technological innovation are concentrated in the hands of a few. These companies depend on labor, raw materials, and digital data—often extracted from the Third World—yet benefit disproportionately from a global architecture that rewards power, not fairness.

Blaming AI is a diversion. The real issue lies in accountability: who sets the rules? Who profits? Who bears the cost? The Third World’s crisis is not the result of a single technology—it is the outcome of centuries of exploitation and an international system that still privileges the powerful.

To build a just world, we must confront the colonial past and dismantle the unfair trade, financial, and technological orders that continue to marginalize the Third World. We must demand equitable access to knowledge, fair trade terms, and the end of structural domination—not scapegoat emerging technologies for a crisis they did not create.

Truthful discourse begins with acknowledging the past and demanding systemic change. Only then can development truly be inclusive and equal.

i like that name ty. BTW how do you like the AI response generated in 10 seconds? i would produce more 10-sec-answers for you if u like

bro do your research, Ai is bias as hell.😭 Like I never said Ai is the cause of third world countries, which is obvious because they always existed. Ai normally cherry picks and just says stuff you would agree with. Tell an Ai an awful buisiness idea like “I want to make a buissness about eating flowers” and it would probably tell you it’s a great idea.

Your ignorance and reliance on Ai is a problem.

[dish-order man]

4 minutes ago, Jakepeng99 said:

 Like I never said Ai is the cause of third world countries, which is obvious because they always existed.

then what is this dude?  are u punching your left face by your right hand?

On 3/27/2026 at 4:26 PM, Jakepeng99 said:

Poor people in both third world and first world countries have to drink dirty water and experience noise and air pollution because of the Ai companies, and pro Ai people like you.

 

 

and come on man, is there anyone need AI to survive？ it is Only someone like you can't distinguish the errors information in AI. They often cite information from unknown sources, which is a common knowledge that all humans know. And you're trying to teach me this? come on dont make me laugh anyway

6 minutes ago, Jakepeng99 said:

your ignorance and reliance on Ai is a problem.