Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think it will be a shadow equivalent to hostile takeover with the warbot equivalent being a super corrupted Charlie and maybe she can be taken by the shadows like wagstaff was by alter feel free to respond with your ideas i will be following this until the update releases and responding often

  • Like 1
4 minutes ago, landromat said:

We saw her as queen chess piece in new animated short, so it's probably going to be queen fight

image.png.af508a940b8cf78c134106fdf382f691.png

The animated short made it seem like we will be fighting on the same side against Them. but oh we'll have to see.

  • Like 2

Yeah that's where i got the Charlie boss fight idea from and to add to my idea i just thought of something if Charlie gets kidnapped by the shadows after the fight that sets up a ark where the players free Charlie and wagstaff from them and that means we could have a Maxwell situation where they become playable after completing the story but one can only hope.... But content is content so i don't mind what we get honestly (:

I look forward to the end of the Hostile Takeover thread. I want survival. I want world generation overhaul. I want optional difficulty increases. I want seasonal threats. I want bossess that are predators not prey (non-optional). I want Don't Starve, not Terraria.

  • Like 6
32 minutes ago, Clopsy627 said:

ark where the players free Charlie and wagstaff from them

I'm pretty sure wagstaff is dead. The version of scion's death animation without wagstaff is called "selfdestruct", and it looks near identical to the later half of the death animation with wagstaff, implying that wagstaff was in the middle of scion's self destruction, and i doubt that he survived that.

  • Like 1
3 hours ago, Evelo said:

I look forward to the end of the Hostile Takeover thread. I want survival. I want world generation overhaul. I want optional difficulty increases. I want seasonal threats. I want bossess that are predators not prey (non-optional). I want Don't Starve, not Terraria.

Yeah more early/mid game content that is actually survival focused would be amazing

3 hours ago, grem6 said:

I'm pretty sure wagstaff is dead. The version of scion's death animation without wagstaff is called "selfdestruct", and it looks near identical to the later half of the death animation with wagstaff, implying that wagstaff was in the middle of scion's self destruction, and i doubt that he survived that.

I had no idea but playable character wise we could get a transmission like single player but just updated but that's probably just me being a wagstaff main on single player

6 hours ago, grem6 said:

I'm pretty sure wagstaff is dead. The version of scion's death animation without wagstaff is called "selfdestruct", and it looks near identical to the later half of the death animation with wagstaff, implying that wagstaff was in the middle of scion's self destruction, and i doubt that he survived that.

dying is such a accomplish feat in the constant

  • Like 2
13 hours ago, Edible Coal said:

dying is such a accomplish feat in the constant

Yeah Maxwell turned to dust but he's fine death is not permanent in the constant

6 hours ago, POOH_LY said:

We might get to help Charlie by defeating her evil side.

That might actually be what we saw in the short not more corrupted but the manifestation of her corruption

20 hours ago, Clopsy627 said:

Yeah that's where i got the Charlie boss fight idea from and to add to my idea i just thought of something if Charlie gets kidnapped by the shadows after the fight that sets up a ark where the players free Charlie and wagstaff from them and that means we could have a Maxwell situation where they become playable after completing the story but one can only hope.... But content is content so i don't mind what we get honestly (:

Here's hoping. This is my ideal outcome

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, Dr. Safety said:

Here's hoping. This is my ideal outcome

Personally, I only see Charlie being a playable character, as they seem to not want port over old characters and content. I'm not confident it'll happen, but it's worth hoping for. I mean, we all don't starve to-get-HER.

  • Like 1
14 minutes ago, GrapeVruit said:

Personally, I only see Charlie being a playable character, as they seem to not want port over old characters and content. I'm not confident it'll happen, but it's worth hoping for. I mean, we all don't starve to-get-HER.

I could see Wagstaff being ported over if they change up his kit (similar to what they did for Warly). Winona kinda has better versions of all of his upsides. Even if they don't want to port over most of the singleplayer cast, Wagstaff is a step above the rest, if for no other reason than him being such a big part of the story. Him just being beamed out of existence is a really unsatisfying end. Being forced to exist in the Constant as a survivor with no projection safety net is a fitting "end" for him

  • Like 1

I definitely don't see us "killing" Charlie like we did with wagstaff since she's supposed to be the creature in the darkness, so that still being there would make no sense of you defeat her and it going away will make the lunar sides rewards even more underwhelming, so we will probably kill the creature controlling her at the end of the video.

  • Like 1
1 minute ago, Johnny_Waffles said:

I definitely don't see us "killing" Charlie like we did with wagstaff since she's supposed to be the creature in the darkness, so that still being there would make no sense of you defeat her and it going away will make the lunar sides rewards even more underwhelming, so we will probably kill the creature controlling her at the end of the video.

they could just make it some other creature in darkness, with new quotes from winona and max to indicate that

and tbf lunar rift already almost removes charlie, brightshade helm makes you immune to her

Edited by grem6
  • Like 1
18 hours ago, grem6 said:

they could just make it some other creature in darkness, with new quotes from winona and max to indicate that

and tbf lunar rift already almost removes charlie, brightshade helm makes you immune to her

 

18 hours ago, Johnny_Waffles said:

I definitely don't see us "killing" Charlie like we did with wagstaff since she's supposed to be the creature in the darkness, so that still being there would make no sense of you defeat her and it going away will make the lunar sides rewards even more underwhelming, so we will probably kill the creature controlling her at the end of the video.

Yeah i agree we will probably get a different shadow entity or her evil side where she would normally appear and her nice side would be playable with a trace of her power remaining

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
  • Create New...