the storytelling by Walter in solo & the portable tent sanity recover visual effect is wrong in the game. This thread was based on wrong info and I already report the bug in bug tracker.

[Catuna_]

1 minute ago, Steorra said:

I'm sorry for my wrong info which caused by the visual bug in the game. yes you are right. the sanity recovering effect of campfire is lower than portable tent. 

again, I'm sorry.

Its alright to be wrong but its important that you research game mechanics further and maybe even take a look at the code before coming to conclusions as ive noticed that this isnt the only inaccuracy or piece of misinformation within your posts 

[Steorra]

Just now, Catuna_ said:

maybe even take a look at the code

mostly I got info from huijiwiki of DST （https://dontstarve.huijiwiki.com/wiki/）or test it in game by myself, and sometimes I got info by using the "insight" mod.

I have to say, I have no code reading ability for current stage. But I personally think that's not a necessary requirement for beta feedback...?

[YouKnowWho142]

5 minutes ago, Steorra said:

mostly I got info from huijiwiki of DST （https://dontstarve.huijiwiki.com/wiki/）or test it in game by myself

i checked this wiki and it also said the portable tent restored 1 sanity per second (or 60 sanity per minute). Perhaps you misinterpreted?

[Steorra]

10 minutes ago, YouKnowWho142 said:

i checked this wiki and it also said the portable tent restored 1 sanity per second (or 60 sanity per minute). Perhaps you misinterpreted?

I was only checking the arrow visual effect in game but have not to verify the wiki info. I already report this visual bug in beta's bug tracker.

[Reiko24]

1 hour ago, Gashzer said:

 

Klei are not stupid Steorra they can see you post topic after topic asking for Walter nerfs. The feedback you are providing is full of negative bias and isn't based on or reflecting real walter gameplay.

Real. Just stop. Everyone can see that this „feedback” is based on prejudice and anger, rather than objective opinions.

[Steorra]

4 minutes ago, Reiko24 said:

Real. Just stop. Everyone can see that this „feedback” is based on prejudice and anger, rather than objective opinions.

you may go report it to Klei if you insist ignoring my buff ideas about Walter selectively.

[Civecilim]

48 minutes ago, Reiko24 said:

Real. Just stop. Everyone can see that this „feedback” is based on prejudice and anger, rather than objective opinions

 

2 hours ago, Gashzer said:

Klei are not stupid Steorra they can see you post topic after topic asking for Walter nerfs

 

3 hours ago, Reiko24 said:

The same as their behavior of spamming Walter nerf posts because he got more attention than Wendy did. „If I didn’t get what I want, then no one can!”

While this post does have a trigger happy sort of vibe, technically speaking, this is not an accurate characterization of this particular post, because this particular post suggests a Walter (tent) buff, rather than a nerf.

[Crimson Hollow]

26 minutes ago, Civecilim said:

 

 

While this post does have a trigger happy sort of vibe, technically speaking, this is not an accurate characterization of this particular post, because this particular post suggests a Walter (tent) buff, rather than a nerf.

The post was edited. The original was like this: 

 

[mykenception]

1 hour ago, Civecilim said:

 

 

While this post does have a trigger happy sort of vibe, technically speaking, this is not an accurate characterization of this particular post, because this particular post suggests a Walter (tent) buff, rather than a nerf.

it changed after finding out the details about the tent, and after the edits it also got debunked

so yeah

it originally just wanted nerfs on one of walter's original perks

[Steorra]

15 minutes ago, mykenception said:

it changed after finding out the details about the tent, and after the edits it also got debunked

so yeah

it originally just wanted nerfs on one of walter's original perks

So you guys think the function of edit is for lie but not for elaborate or change the ideas?

And have to say when my edit the post the argument of the detail math has not posted.

[SilverSpoon]

11 hours ago, Reiko24 said:

„If I didn’t get what I want, then no one can!”

...What's wrong with that? It's called "Character Balance."

AFK Gestaby, Tanky Abigail and Morning Growly auto-farming were rejected from the forums for being "No effort, No skill."

If that's the case, then if other characters have "No effort, No skill" aspects, then we should reject them as well, otherwise we'll have double standards.

[SilverSpoon]

18 minutes ago, Steorra said:

So you guys think the function of edit is for lie but not for elaborate or change the ideas?

And have to say when my edit the post the argument of the detail math has not posted.

Strikethroughs are effective in preventing such misunderstandings.