Jump to content

gas pipes balancing in a 4x6 space


Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, OxCD said:

I don't have the context but is already perfectible by adding a bridge before each T cross, where the output is on the cross. It will allow full flow to be re-oriented if one pipe's full.

Yup.

This essentially does the same as the one posted above.

image.thumb.png.de8054f152781204a0672cf21af3aabb.png

30 minutes ago, JohnFrancis said:

I'm going to have to give all these a test. I got sent a 3*9 design listed below. But I'm pretty sure we can get a dual pipe load balance down to a 3*6.

https://imgur.com/a/9B2tXsP

Not sure why you want this but here you go. Full double line load balancing in the smallest possible space.

image.thumb.png.d53a290acbef0232dda410c0ac08448a.png

2 minutes ago, Saturnus said:

Not sure why you want this but here you go. Full double line load balancing in the smallest possible space.

image.thumb.png.d53a290acbef0232dda410c0ac08448a.png

You've forgot the bridge just before the T cross, with the output on the cross ;) those we've talked before.

By the way I really like how you're stepping the building process, with those pics.

17 minutes ago, OxCD said:

You've forgot the bridge just before the T cross, with the output on the cross ;) those we've talked before.

By the way I really like how you're stepping the building process, with those pics.

Cheers. But no, this works fine as pictured with any amount in either line.

It's the exact same set up as the OPs except just compacted.

While looking at my build above I realized. I don't need 6 bridges. 4 bridges will be fine. So here it is. The ultimate version.

image.thumb.png.0a5377cda9923113bbabac789edb18af.png

14 minutes ago, Saturnus said:

Cheers. But no, this works fine as pictured with any amount in either line.

It's the exact same set up as the OPs except just compacted.

What about a bridge just before the T to make sure the whole flow will be re-routed to available pipe ? If one pipe is congested, the other one will only get 1/2 packets, no ?

2 minutes ago, OxCD said:

What about a bridge just before the T to make sure the whole flow will be re-routed to available pipe ? If one pipe is congested, the other one will only get 1/2 packets, no ?

If either output channel can get congested then the build is pointless. In that case the single bridge version posted above is far superior.

10 minutes ago, Saturnus said:

If either output channel can get congested then the build is pointless. In that case the single bridge version posted above is far superior.

Fair point :p this bridge before would be then, only, in case of emergency :) but nevermind, that's just my way to preview the worst case scenario. It doesn't depreciate your build at all.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.

×
  • Create New...