Seekar Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Bug Submission:Category: GeneralPlatform: PCIssue Title: [bUG] Data Blast // Daemons // OrderIssue Description: There is apparently an 'order' to the firewalls that get hacked by a datablast.It seems that thsi should be simultaneous, but... Daemons activate 'during' the Data Blast.Examples:Firewalls Increased -- causes all firewalls not yet cracked (but that would have been if the order were different) to gain a level, thus nullifying the remainder of the Data BlastIncognita Shut Down -- causes all firewalls not yet cracked (but that would have been if the order were different) to stop being hacked.This is annoying at best, and most likely a bug. All firewalls affected by a Data Blast should be broken BEFORE any Daemon affects are applied, especially to other Firewalls in the Data Blast's area of effect.Steps to Reproduce: Use Data Blast on a number of objects that only have 1 firewall left on them; and some of those firewalls have Daemons on them, to include:Firewalls IncreaseorIncognita Shut Down----Unable to attach save file. ?? (That may also be a bug/problem.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Developer rooks Posted November 10, 2014 Developer Share Posted November 10, 2014 I'll take a look at this to ensure Data Blast affects all firewalls simultaneously as you would expect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sphingx Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Just thought I'd mention, it's still happening. A data blast will still trigger the Daemon before the other firewalls are hacked. Even worse, data blast trigger daemons on mainframe devices that have already been hacked and disabled. It's not the intended effect, is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Developer rooks Posted December 2, 2014 Developer Share Posted December 2, 2014 No, it's not (the intended effect). I did take a look to verify the cause, but I'm afraid didn't get around to actually fixing it in time for the last update. It's coming though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5thHorseman Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 Not sure if this is related (or even happening anymore. I don't use parasite much because I'm impatient) but if 2 things are parasited and would go down in a turn, and one of them has a daemon that raises firewalls, you have a 50/50 chance of getting the two things down, depending on which parasite kicks off first. It seems more logical (to me) for all parasites to go, triggering their daemons, and then once they're all done those daemons are actually applied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.