A test & feedback of Walter's fault tolerance towards Bee Queen: Facetanking is available! (If you insist to do)

[Y0sH]

3 minutes ago, Steorra said:

Your evidence simply proves my innocence lol. You are still being selectively blind to "If you have your own ideas ..." sentence. Klei are not idiot. Try to think if your evidence is enough to prove my fault to Klei or not.

Or, maybe your true purpose is just for making those who already have bias to me to have more bias, but not trying to report my "fault" to Klei, you do know your evidence provided nothing to Klei at all right? Brilliantly (shrug)

Go say this to those who started it by bias and malicious first.

I don't think anyone has any bias towards you at all I think as a whole the forums no longer takes you serious. The evidence shows that all you want is Wendy buffs and when that didn't work out for you, you went on your "Balance" arc, calling for nerfs on every other character. So have fun and post to your heart's content.

[Steorra]

5 minutes ago, Y0sH said:

as a whole the forums no longer takes you serious

You do expose what your true purpose here - to persuade Klei to moderate Steorra is never your purpose, your only purpose is to invalid me from other forum folks. 

That's why you do have no interest about if your "evidence" is enough for judge my fault or not. You only care if your "evidence" is enough for rising more bias from other folks to me.

And I do knew that you DID SPREADING those "evidence" for rising the bias to me in my back. How innocent and "0% malice including" you are!

[Y0sH]

2 minutes ago, Steorra said:

You do expose what your true purpose here - to persuade Klei to moderate Steorra is never your purpose, your only purpose is to invalid me from other forum folks. 

That's why you do have no interest about if your "evidence" is enough for judge my fault or not. You only care if your "evidence" is enough for rising more bias from other folks to me.

Nah, my purpose is to tell you that no one takes you serious. Look how people respond to your posts in multiple threads. This has nothing to do with me, in fact I thought I was doing you a favor letting you know but ok, I'm done with this discussion. Have fun.

[Dingle]

Time to check out a popular thread!

Oh.

[Guille6785]

for the 5064th time, wendy does not need an immortal abigail or a wasd controllable abigail

ps: posting screenshots of forum users' posts that you disagree with on your forum so you can collectively make fun of them is not helping your case

[Gashzer]

10 minutes ago, Guille6785 said:

for the 5064th time, wendy does not need an immortal abigail or a wasd controllable abigail

ps: posting screenshots of forum users' posts that you disagree with on your forum so you can collectively make fun of them is not helping your case

Ma! Look! I'm famous! 

[Yaorin yon]

23 minutes ago, Guille6785 said:

for the 5064th time, wendy does not need an immortal abigail or a wasd controllable abigail

ps: posting screenshots of forum users' posts that you disagree with on your forum so you can collectively make fun of them is not helping your case

When some statements need to be specifically framed by others, it seems that promoting the futility of such behavior can cover up the shame one should feel. For example, let's try to find the offensive remarks that Mr. Guille once deleted on his own without offering an apology...?

 

51000 views:

【这位著名的速通玩家只是修改了游戏程序【饥荒】-哔哩哔哩】 https://b23.tv/SAlG2wx

 

[mima_]

imagine simping one char so hard that everyone think u have different motive everytime posting about another char..
wait.... why i felt that i typed this sentence before  cant find it tho, so trippy, is this what people call dejavu  

[YouKnowWho142]

Why are we still getting threads like this? There is zero basis for constructive feedback and all it does is prove that Walter has a harder time fighting bee queen than any other character if he isn’t utilizing his unique advantages. The post also comes off as really defensive which shouldn’t be happening if the thread was only about feedback.

[Radicaljoe]

It seems like you prepared for that bq fight significantly. I'd imagine any character that had to put in that much prep time should deserve to have an easier fight.

[Mr. Furman]

What I said elsewhere I will put here again: 

You are basically inviting negativity toward something you're trying to protect. 

[Gashzer]

26 minutes ago, mima_ said:

imagine simping one char so hard that everyone think u have different motive everytime posting about another char..
wait.... why i felt that i typed this sentence before  cant find it tho, so trippy, is this what people call dejavu  

If only the forums had another person to direct all that simping energy towards...................  

 

 

 

[Echsrick]

can we please remove this thread here completly? i dont think at this point this will get anywhere anymore

[kroban]

6 hours ago, Steorra said:

misinformation.

Stop acting like you want to have a "good discussion" if you are constantly acting like a "debate bro" in the comments. Stop with the pretending, you are clearly acting with malice, you said in many of these salty posts that you are doing this out of spite for Wendy getting nerfed.

You have 0 interest in discussing about this topic, the moment someone disagrees with you you go "nope misinformation nope make a new thread nope off topic", you started playing Walter a couple days ago, theres people that have been playing him constantly since years and even more so during the beta. You clearly know much less about the character than the people that main him.

4 hours ago, Steorra said:

Though you have your right to share your opinions on topic or by creating a new thread.

No, everyone has the right to share their opinions on theses posts, specially if you are acting with malice, stop telling everyone to "make a new thread" only because you are losing the argument. Many of the comments here are staying on topic, just because people name other characters that doesn't make it off topic at all. And people seeing through your facade and talking about YOUR behaviour isn't off-topic too, because you are showing it in this same thread.

Everyone in this forum already knows you, you spent the entire beta talking about Wendy, spamming threads about her, constantly flooding the first page with your suggestions about Wendy, and you literally said in many comments that you main her. Now suddenly Klei gives Walter a glow up, spends 2 weeks with his changes after Wendy had the entire spotlight for 90% of the beta, and suddenly you start making posts about nerfing Walter? You are being petty my man, go cry over Wendy on a corner and stop with these bait posts.

[aidankocherhans]

2 hours ago, Catuna_ said:

Let's not bring this sort of talk into the forums... We shouldn't make this thread devolve further.

I mean, where can this discussion even go when the original post is essentially spam of the same topic posted over and over from the same person? (Who kinda admitted to not having honest intentions)

[Crimson Hollow]

5 minutes ago, aidankocherhans said:

I mean, where can this discussion even go when the original post is essentially spam of the same topic posted over and over from the same person? (Who kinda admitted to not having honest intentions)

Well at least for now its a good punching bag for ppl to let off some steam

The thing is, not everyone here hates wendy inherently and will actually give constructive suggestions but now these posts will only turn them into haters bc apparently ppl arent inclined to help someone whos actively trying to hurt them

[salty_cookie]

JoeW please save us

[Yaorin yon]

Some people vehemently condemned others for doing exactly what they themselves had done, putting on a sanctimonious act of innocence. This really took the mockery of forum discussions to a whole new level.

[Mysterious box]