Jump to content

Add some hunger cost to all of Woby's actions as a trade-off/为woby的各项行为都添加一些饱食度消耗作为代价


Recommended Posts

  
    Currently, Woby's "retrieving," "foraging," and "deliver" commands require no effort or cost. All you need to do is click a button to achieve functions that many other characters can't perform, or that would cost other characters some resources to do. Moreover, it doesn't make sense that Woby doesn't consume anything while performing these tasks.
  • Woby's "retrieving" skill significantly outperforms Wormwood's carrat in every aspect. For a detailed analysis, please refer to my post below.

 

  • The "foraging" skill is a resource-gathering ability. In comparison, "Applied Horticulture," which is also a resource-gathering skill, requires the user to additionally consume sanity.
  • For such a unique skill like "deliver," it's surprising that Woby doesn't get hungry at all after long-distance travel. Woby should consume hunger based on the distance traveled during these activities.
These skills should not be usable when Woby's hunger is insufficient.
 

 

  现在Woby的“retrieving”,“foraging”,“deliver”指令都无需仍和消耗,只需点一个按钮就可以实现很多角色无法实现和一些角色需要花费代价才能实现的功能。而且woby做这些事什么都不会消耗这也并不合理。

  • “retrieving”技能已经在各方面战胜沃姆伍德的carrat了,详细分析看我上面这篇帖子。
  • “foraging”技能是一个获取资源的技能,同样作为获取资源的代表“应用园艺学”还需要额外消耗使用者的理智值。
  • “deliver”这样独一无二的技能,woby进行往返的长途跋涉居然一点也不饿。Woby应该根据往返的路程长度消耗饱食度

这些技能在woby饱食度不足时应该无法进行。

  I am reposting this thread because the original one was locked without any explanation. The discussions under the original post were on-topic.
  If the original post was locked due to off-topic or discriminatory/abusive comments in the discussions, it was not led by the original poster. Therefore, I am reposting it to continue our normal discussion on this issue.
  Additionally, I hope that in the future, the official team will provide reasons for locking a post to prevent players from being confused or misunderstanding the forum as a "echo chamber" that only wants to hear information that conforms to the official narrative.@JoeW

It's just a strategy to lock a thread which folks dislike. They slander you, put words into your mouth, making the discussion being off topic and personally, trying to manipulate your emotion, for just locking your argument with evidences which they dislike. 

This already happened to many times during the December of last years. Don't be surprised.

16 minutes ago, Steorra said:

It's just a strategy to lock a thread which folks dislike. They slander you, put words into your mouth, making the discussion being off topic and personally, trying to manipulate your emotion, for just locking your argument with evidences which they dislike. 

This already happened to many times during the December of last years. Don't be surprised.

A great evidence to prove the things I said above is, you, the writer of this thread, got a slander as "you are the Wendy player", which is completely false truth. Folks just keep ignoring the fact they dislike, ignoring all efforts you gave to Walter. Because they hate you by their own bias.

13 minutes ago, Steorra said:

A great evidence to prove the things I said above is, you, the writer of this thread, got a slander as "you are the Wendy player".l, which is completely false truth. Folks just keep ignoring the fact they dislike, ignoring all efforts you gave to Walter. Because they hate you by their own bias.

And also, Klei won't punish any slander words. They just keep ignoring them by mysterious reason. 

At least, this forum is not for personally matters but only for feedback. But I do have no idea why Klei would tolerate such continuously harassment towards specific players "i.e. toward Chinese players, toward Wendy players, etc", even the harassment is also broken the guidelines. It seems more like an encouragement to the bias.

7 minutes ago, ALCRD said:

Here we go again...

If the official team remains ambiguous about important issues, choosing to evade, stifle discussions, and stay silent—leaving players to argue among themselves—we will keep coming back to demand answers.

I reckon you could add something like "the former post got locked, probably because of people's off-topic posts, so I posted this again for more constructive posts", so that this one won't get locked, and avoid some expected mocks

12 minutes ago, YXukun said:

I reckon you could add something like "the former post got locked, probably because of people's off-topic posts, so I posted this again for more constructive posts", so that this one won't get locked, and avoid some expected mocks

Yeah. And should remove part of "or misunderstanding the forum as a "echo chamber" that only wants to hear information that conforms to the official narrative."

I've had enough of being unable to have a constructive conversation with each other because of the unnecessary insults and rudeness we are being subjected to. Enough.

26 minutes ago, Natsuki Bamboo said:
If the official team remains ambiguous about important issues, choosing to evade, stifle discussions, and stay silent—leaving players to argue among themselves—we will keep coming back to demand answers.

So you admiting that you will keep spamming forums till your demands are "heard" about supposed "issues" you think are "important"

Which is the most toxic way of conducting feedback to the developers.. and you are surprised why threads like this are getting locked? For real?

18 minutes ago, ALCRD said:

So you admiting that you will keep spamming forums till your demands are "heard" about supposed "issues" you think are "important"

Which is the most toxic way of conducting feedback to the developers.. and you are surprised why threads like this are getting locked? For real?

Trying to invalid people's voice by their reasonable reaction towards the unfair treatment they suffered is not a logical argument I have to say.

When posts are nothing but arguing and bickering and there is no constructive conversation happening, they will be locked - especially if the original poster is taking part in the argument. 

If people would just ignore the thread rather than argue, the thread wouldn't need to be locked. 

NOTE. Every reply in this thread is off topic, including by the original poster and contains no constructive feedback that hasn't already been posted. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
  • Create New...