Neotuck Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 I have been wondering what would work better at conducting heat as Plastic has a thermal conductivity rate of 913 (W/m)/K while a Metal tile has 60 (W/m)/K. At first I assumed more would be better but after running a test with the pictures below I see it moves heat slower. Can some one explain this? The center chamber is filled with solid hydrogen and the two side chambers are filled with O2. As seen in the picture the side that uses metal tiles cools faster than the one with plastic tiles Link to comment https://forums.kleientertainment.com/forums/topic/88164-metal-vs-plastic-heat-conductivity/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rotintin Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 I've been wondering whats best for cooling stuff down, thanks for doing the test. I'm also curious as to why. Link to comment https://forums.kleientertainment.com/forums/topic/88164-metal-vs-plastic-heat-conductivity/#findComment-1009661 Share on other sites More sharing options...
pg13 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 My guess would be the thermal capacity of the plastic is much higher, also it says on the plastic block "slow heating" I think, which is kind of a hint that it's not too fast at conducting. Link to comment https://forums.kleientertainment.com/forums/topic/88164-metal-vs-plastic-heat-conductivity/#findComment-1009662 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neotuck Posted February 28, 2018 Author Share Posted February 28, 2018 2 minutes ago, pg13 said: My guess would be the thermal capacity of the plastic is much higher, also it says on the plastic block "slow heating" I think, which is kind of a hint that it's not too fast at conducting. I don't see "slow heating" but I agree the capacity is much higher than metal Link to comment https://forums.kleientertainment.com/forums/topic/88164-metal-vs-plastic-heat-conductivity/#findComment-1009663 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lacost Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 In theory plastic is the better conductor, which means that more energy can be transfered through it in less time. The thing that separates metal tiles apart from plastic tiles in your test is the thermal capacity. This means that plastic needs more "coldness" to lower temperature initially but once equilibrium is reached, plastic pulls ahead. The limiting factor in your test however is the thermal conductivity of the gas phase you want to cool since plastic can only transfer heat on adjacent tiles. Try to set up a new test where the plastic and metal tiles have the same temperature as the cooling medium. This way you can knock out thermal capacity from the equation since no cooling/heating has to be done on the tiles themselves. Link to comment https://forums.kleientertainment.com/forums/topic/88164-metal-vs-plastic-heat-conductivity/#findComment-1009672 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lutzkhie Posted March 1, 2018 Share Posted March 1, 2018 culprit is the specific heat of the material tungsten has 0.134 (J/g)/K while plastic has 1.92 (J/g)/K, which means plastic requires more energy before its temperature drops by 1K try other refined metals just for experimenting Link to comment https://forums.kleientertainment.com/forums/topic/88164-metal-vs-plastic-heat-conductivity/#findComment-1009699 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.