Deltic Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 Why steam still requires 2000 kg of steel to be built, while the other large engines with much better performance like radbolt doesn't need that much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DolphinWing Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 The steam engine is quite powerful rocket after last buff. It has more height (25 vs 20) and more power watt (600w vs 0w) than the radbolt engine. It has same range (10 hex) as small petro rocket but more heights (25 vs 20) and no oxidizer required. So maybe this is why it costs that much. I guess that is dev's answer to high steel cost for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasza22 Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 The steam engine has the same cost as in the vanilla game iirc. Back there all rocket parts required steel as it was sopposed to be high tech. The steam engine was especially expensive due to it being self sufficient (no fuel tanks or oxydizer needed). I guess it could get some minor addjustments to it`s cost in the dlc though as it`s still semi low tier and some better engines are cheaper. Or they could make the radbolt engine more expensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.