SrCreator Posted August 14, 2019 Share Posted August 14, 2019 We know that ethanol pollutes far less than fossil fuels (like oil ...). How about using the oil-powered power generator, but when using ethanol, you should reduce the carbon dioxide pollution emitted, or use another type of ethanol-powered generator. Something wiser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobucles Posted August 14, 2019 Share Posted August 14, 2019 It'd certainly be nice to have more consistency between pollution outputs. Coal generates a mere 20g/s of CO2, but the other dirty machines generate more CO2 by orders of magnitude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasza22 Posted August 15, 2019 Share Posted August 15, 2019 I think it`s intended. The wood burner is meant to be a more of an CO2 creator than a power machine and CO2 is useful on forest starts if you rely on oxyfern. Coal gen is meant to be pretty easy to deal with early so produces a little. Nat gas gen produces more but can vent it anywhere. It`s also suppsed to be pretty clean at least compared to the petrol gen. That monster is supposed to fill all the are with fumes as it`s major drawback so you start considering more ecological energy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrCreator Posted August 15, 2019 Author Share Posted August 15, 2019 There is one more thing related to the subject, notice that we have hydrogen generator and natural gas generator, both generate the same amount of power (800w), we do not have intermediate to the next level, 2MW OIL GENERATOR generator? An intermediate of 1MW or 1.2 MW or 1.6MW would be good per standard without MOD. What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.