My dissatisfaction with the excessive attention paid to Wendy.

[Chewabacca]

Just now, DaDa_waw said:

So, do people need to come under the skill tree of Wortox and Walter and say, 'No, I don't allow your suggestion, Wortox and Walter are already too powerful'/'Wortox and Walter are stealing other updates'? I don't think anyone should do this, right? Or do many people think that doing such a stupid thing under Wendy's skill tree advice is only natural?

If they've actually played Walter or Wortox and have honest feedback to share, I wouldn't mind that, even if the feedback is "this feels overpowered". There was a huge Wortox thread that sadly got deleted because of personal attacks where someone who regularly played Wortox argued that soul jars obliterated Wortox's problem with resource management and made him more brain-dead to play, and while a bunch of people disagreed with that, that was still honest feedback that should be considered. Lardee has also made a Walter thread arguing that Walter's ranged combat being improved was bad because it led to a "hold-F" playstyle and entered into another thread to continue arguing this, and, again, while I disagree with his opinion, it led to a worthwhile discussion about the effect of the slowdown rounds on how he fights, why Walter's play rate is so low, and what could be done to make him more interesting to play. My problem is when people give feedback based on dishonesty, because that can lead to 0 worthwhile discussions.