Jump to content

If the Benevolent rabbit king Is prejudice towards monster characters it shouldn’t be considered benevolent


Recommended Posts

While we’re on the subject of the update does anyone else feel that the Great Depths Worm should summon depth worms like the varglet equivalent that it is also I think there should be a normal varg equivalent called the Greater Depths Worm and maybe some gem version of depth worms sense for hounds it red and blue how bout for depth worms it’s green and orange maybe do an alignment flip of horror hounds and briar wolves  for dead depth worms also thank you something like how brightshade gestalts possess the bodies of boss Mob Then have one of the boss mob that get possessed be the greater depth worm

I was just thinking if rabbit King is prejudice does that mean that non-bunny men rabbits are also secretly prejudice

Do you think the rabbit king is also king of the Bunnymen or do you think they’re just allies?

12 hours ago, NPCMaxwell said:

Poor monster characters. Maybe the name for him would be better related to the beardlords then.

Hey do you think I should update the deadly sin theory and make it just the royalty rather then including the gods I thinks the rabbit king would fit the wrath role and the merm king could take the role of gluttony but sloth role would be empty 

4 hours ago, Dr.Webber said:

While we’re on the subject of the update does anyone else feel that the Great Depths Worm should summon depth worms like the varglet equivalent that it is also I think there should be a normal varg equivalent called the Greater Depths Worm and maybe some gem version of depth worms sense for hounds it red and blue how bout for depth worms it’s green and orange maybe do an alignment flip of horror hounds and briar wolves  for dead depth worms also thank you something like how brightshade gestalts possess the bodies of boss Mob Then have one of the boss mob that get possessed be the greater depth worm

considering how many of my bunnymen one can take down i would be quite reluctant to want that

16 minutes ago, gaymime said:

considering how many of my bunnymen one can take down i would be quite reluctant to want that

But the beautiful chaos

4 minutes ago, Dr.Webber said:

But the beautiful chaos

i assure you it is some sort of chaos already x''D i am already redesigning my bunny circles to account for the big guy since i need about 4x the amount as i do for a worm wave(the bone protrusions shred bunnies and trigger their run instinct right away)

4 hours ago, Dr.Webber said:

I was just thinking if rabbit King is prejudice does that mean that non-bunny men rabbits are also secretly prejudice

Do you think the rabbit king is also king of the Bunnymen or do you think they’re just allies?

Hey do you think I should update the deadly sin theory and make it just the royalty rather then including the gods I thinks the rabbit king would fit the wrath role and the merm king could take the role of gluttony but sloth role would be empty 

If you want to chance the deadly sin list, feel free to do so, maybe it would be less confusing then. Maybe we get another royalty in the future to take the last place.

 

I am quite SURE that feral rabbit people are prejudice. Of course they run away from everyone, but if they follow the same logic as other monster-attacking creatures they seem to be more afraid of certain creatures / behaviour they personally consider "monsters". (they just won't tell you since they just run away)

I have an AU in which feral rabbits where created based on Bunnymen, but the one creating feral rabbits was Wes and they were meant to cheer up throne-imprisoned Maxwell (to remind him of stage magician shows), and now with the rabbit King I include him to be a chosen one among the feral rabbits, who is to lead the rabbits underground where they stay with the Bunnymen each spring and do trading and exchange on what was going on on the surface / the underground. (That's why Bunnymen will attack you when carrying meat as they were probably told by the rabbits that you were hunting rabbits on the surface and therefore wants to hunt /YOU/ now.)

Now now, i'm pretty sure at least when i played Webber i was able to trade with the king. What matters is not having meat/monstermeat in your inv. That's what makes him mad, but i could trade with him just fine. I'll have to re-check.

18 minutes ago, JesseB_Klei said:

This version should be passive to monster characters if they are not carrying meat.

Does that apply to all Characters or just the monster ones

Based on the fact that they made the royal rabbit enforcers bunnyman variants rather then beardling variants I’m starting to lean more towards him being king of both

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.

×
  • Create New...