Zarquan Posted January 30, 2025 Share Posted January 30, 2025 I often see people build their petroleum boilers with the boiler room connected to the first layer of their counterflow heat exchanger. However, this is inefficient, as you are using your heat source to heat what is meant to be cooled, which can lead to things like broken pipes and inefficient use of your heat source. Here I have two almost identical petroleum boilers. The left one has the petroleum in contact on the first layer in contact with the first layer. The right one has a thermal separation in the form of an escher waterfall. On both, the crude oil enters at 76.9 C. The left one has the petroleum leave the exchanger at 111 C, and the one on the right has the petroleum leave at 109.4 C. Measuring heat energy from the heat source, which is just a preheated bar of steam set to 1000 C at the start and left to run for about 7132 seconds, the left boiler lost 218.2 more MJ of heat energy than the one on the right, which is almost exactly the difference in heat energy in the petroleum. It also makes your pipes less susceptible to breaking, as the last radiant pipe is exposed to 377.5 C rather than 394.8 C. This simple separation saves my design about 6.7% of the energy just from one waterfall while also making the design safer. Also, you don't need to use an escher waterfall if you build your boiler one tile higher or your heat exchanger one tile lower. Link to comment https://forums.kleientertainment.com/forums/topic/163559-psa-you-should-thermally-separate-your-boiler-room-from-your-heat-exchanger/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
superscooper Posted February 9, 2025 Share Posted February 9, 2025 That is brilliant. I had honestly never even given a thought to separating the two. Link to comment https://forums.kleientertainment.com/forums/topic/163559-psa-you-should-thermally-separate-your-boiler-room-from-your-heat-exchanger/#findComment-1794829 Share on other sites More sharing options...
6Havok9 Posted February 9, 2025 Share Posted February 9, 2025 Imho normal waterfall is the way to go: no gases ever inside the boiler, and provides a convenient entry from the top if you build the rows two tall, allowing dupe access. Which you don't need to allow, ofc, but you can never be sure enough. Link to comment https://forums.kleientertainment.com/forums/topic/163559-psa-you-should-thermally-separate-your-boiler-room-from-your-heat-exchanger/#findComment-1795015 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zarquan Posted February 9, 2025 Author Share Posted February 9, 2025 2 hours ago, 6Havok9 said: Imho normal waterfall is the way to go: no gases ever inside the boiler, and provides a convenient entry from the top if you build the rows two tall, allowing dupe access. Yeah, it doesn't need to be an escher waterfall, but I like escher waterfalls. My thinking is that dupe access could also be handled by an opening in the airflow tiles on the top, but it is also not really needed if it is set up right. Link to comment https://forums.kleientertainment.com/forums/topic/163559-psa-you-should-thermally-separate-your-boiler-room-from-your-heat-exchanger/#findComment-1795048 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.