What's the possibility of DS getting another dlc?

[Hungry French]

1 minute ago, gamehun20 said:

Because it is?

How can a sequel come out as a spin-off game and contradict the original ?

[gamehun20]

Just now, Hungry French said:

How can a sequel come out as a spin-off game and contradict the original ?

It doesn't contradict the original tho?

[Hungry French]

4 minutes ago, gamehun20 said:

It doesn't contradict the original tho?

Do you understand that the DST has supplemented the old ent DS with events that do not exist in the DS?
Like some things in DS  in DST don't exist? 
Have you played DS ? DST is a multiplayer spin-off.

Or DST is recanon lore. But then the current state of the DS is not canonical or DST no canonical.

[gamehun20]

10 minutes ago, Hungry French said:

Do you understand that the DST has supplemented the old ent DS with events that do not exist in the DS?
Like some things in DS  in DST don't exist? 
Have you played DS ? DST is a multiplayer spin-off.

Or DST is recanon lore. But then the current state of the DS is not canonical or DST no canonical.

Yes i have played both games but maybe you should actually mention what you think doesn't make sense or is missing between the 2 games instead of just saying the same manure over and over again yeah i know you think dst sucks but you don't actually ever elaborate on it properly 

[BalkanCockroach]

1 hour ago, Hungry French said:

Do you understand that the DST has supplemented the old ent DS with events that do not exist in the DS?
Like some things in DS  in DST don't exist? 
Have you played DS ? DST is a multiplayer spin-off.

Or DST is recanon lore. But then the current state of the DS is not canonical or DST no canonical.

Explain what exists in DST that's not in DS thats been retconned.

[Hungry French]

1 minute ago, BalkanCockroach said:

Explain what exists in DST that's not in DS thats been retconned.

I won't say everything, because it's too much text.

Atrium, Ancient Fuelweaver, Ancient Archive, Lunar Stones.

The rest has an unnamed status. That is, we do not know whether it was in the DS or appeared in the DST.

The appearance of the moon island was in DST yes. But even if there were no DST, he would have fallen, because his fall is not accompanied by any event that is not possible in solo.
All the plot events in DST would happen regardless of whether everyone survives together or each on their own.

And the content of the DST is not infrequently contradicted even by an animated video. (Yes, you can say that this is a game convention, but you can say that about anything)

Some things are not in the DST that were in the DS.

And some things appeared in DS after appearing in DST.

[BalkanCockroach]

45 minutes ago, Hungry French said:

Atrium, Ancient Fuelweaver, Ancient Archive, Lunar Stones.

In the lore sense it could've been discovered later. And DST is another layer of the constant so theres that.

[arubaro]

1 hour ago, Hungry French said:

What do we see in DS, RoG, Shipwrecked and Hamlet?
Bosses have 1250-3500 health.
 

All bosses in DST are already endurance fights.

To be realistic. Then the only bosses who could approach 10k hp in DS are the Lunar Champion. 
It should have approximately 2000 in phase 1, 2500 in phase 2 and 3000 in phase 3. ( Although I think Klei would have made a lower hp )

that arent bosses, just mobs with high damage

[BalkanCockroach]

6 minutes ago, Hungry French said:

The appearance of the moon island was in DST yes. But even if there were no DST, he would have fallen, because his fall is not accompanied by any event that is not possible in solo

Alter sees that "they" have found a new host (Charlie) which wants to bring "them" back so it decides to send a piece of itself to clash with the constants shadows.

[Hungry French]

2 minutes ago, arubaro said:

that arent bosses, just mobs with high damage

There are no bosses in DST, just mobs with high health

1 minute ago, BalkanCockroach said:

Alter sees that "they" have found a new host (Charlie) which wants to bring "them" back so it decides to send a piece of itself to clash with the constants shadows.

And Charlie can be a host even in DS.

And where is it shown ? If you're talking about this moment, then Charlie was on an already fallen Lunar Island.If 

[BalkanCockroach]

10 minutes ago, Hungry French said:

And where is it shown?

Where is anything shown? This isn't a tv series. It's a game that vaguely tells the bigger narrative. You figure the pieces out for yourself. You are clearly trying to find dirt on DST for the sake of it. And im really tired so i don't wish to continue discussing this and feeding into your sillyness. Also if said features weren't introduced you'd be like "DST dry they made sequel with no features waaaah waaah".

[Hungry French]

12 minutes ago, BalkanCockroach said:

In the lore sense it could've been discovered later. And the DST is another layer of the constant so theres that.

The fall of lunar meteorites has always been. This is confirmed even by Wilba and Wormwood lore.

Where in the ent does it say that it is discovered later? 

Do you think that out of 19 DS characters, no one found a stone in the forest?
Or didn 't they break spilagmites and stalagmites ?
Or don't kill Tentacle pillar ?
Or don't kill Ancient Guardian ?
Or don't find a suspicious passage in the mushroom forest ?

Wilson seriously went to the incredibly dangerous Sacred biomes in ruins and didn 't even look into the calm biome of blue mushroom trees and didn 't find a hole with a passage there ?

[BalkanCockroach]

9 minutes ago, Hungry French said:

The fall of lunar meteorites has always been. This is confirmed even by Wilba and Wormwood lore.

Where in the ent does it say that it is discovered later? 

Do you think that out of 19 DS characters, no one found a stone in the forest?
Or didn 't they break spilagmites and stalagmites ?
Or don't kill Tentacle pillar ?
Or don't kill Ancient Guardian ?
Or don't find a suspicious passage in the mushroom forest ?

Wilson seriously went to the incredibly dangerous Sacred biomes in ruins and didn 't even look into the calm biome of blue mushroom trees and didn 't find a hole with a passage there ?

You do realise in order to make a sequel you need new features right?

Anyways was my last reply to you. Take care.

[Hungry French]

8 minutes ago, BalkanCockroach said:

Where is anything shown? This isn't a tv series. It's a game that vaguely tells the bigger narrative. You figure the pieces out for yourself. You are clearly trying to find dirt on DST for the sake of it. And im really tired so i don't wish to continue discussing this and feeding into your sillyness. Also if said features weren't introduced you'd be like "DST dry they made sequel with no features waaaah waaah".

I figured out the pieces and DST is not canon.  And 99% of the unique content could be in DS or DS 2.

They made *multiplayer Don't Starve without features.*
This is logical. DS - solo, DST - multiplayer.

Now I can say "DS yes they made prequell with no features waaagh waaah".

The same is said by people who remember DS and RoG.

DS and RoG content must be completely unique and it SHOULD NOT BE IN the DST
No NORMAL game devalues the prequel after the release of the sequel

No NORMAL game does not transfer all the content of the original game and DLC to sequel XD. This is unrealistically stupid and because of this, DS has no online.

You'll say Shipwrecked and Hamlet. Wow. I don't have to buy the game, but DLC'S for it. So also not complementary games, but acting as small alter worlds that are 5 times smaller than DST

7 minutes ago, BalkanCockroach said:

You do realise in order to make a sequel you need new features right?

Anyways was my last reply to you. Take care.

?

And for you, the sequel is to copy all the content of the last game and add a new one ? Trash Overwatch 2 moment

35 minutes ago, BalkanCockroach said:

You figure the pieces out for yourself. 

So if you figured it out and you know. Then why don 't you tell me what the pieces are ?

[Mike23Ua]

So no normal game transfers all the content of the original into the sequel huh? Does anyone care to tell them about Left 4 Dead & Left 4 Dead 2? 
 

My point friend, is that no normal game transfers the content of a Sequel back over into the game that came out before it. I mean could imagine if they added the Stag hover jets of Saints Row 3 into Saints Row 1?! (which only show up after YOU accidentally kill an innocent girl in Saints Row 2 and so the Military is Hellbent on bringing you to Justice in SR 3) 

Completely Unacceptable that The military jets weren’t always in the franchise chasing me for no reason right?

*sigh*

What is it particularly that you dislike so much about DST, that you can’t just play DST without other players involved?

If it’s because of extremely high health raid bosses, then you can just simply uhh not fight those? I mean like personally… I DONT Fight raid Bosses because I don’t see any “Point” in fighting raid Bosses..

If I’m playing the game to be challenged by the way I progress around & explore the map, to have the seasons challenge me- And to even alter world Gen settings to play the game in an experience more difficult than Default settings (such as lights out mode..)

Then fighting raid bosses who’s ONLY purpose is to give me an item that will make being challenged by the game easier with these new items- Doesn’t make much sense..

An excellent Example is Antlion- If you go fight or appease her she will stop damaging your world with sinkhole craters, BUT if you ignore fighting her… she goes from 2 sinkholes, up to 7.

And as someone who plays DST almost exclusively Alone: I can tell you that outside of raid bosses, and a small handful of mobs with endless minion spam - That DST is perfectly playable Alone.

I can play DST as Wes and unless I’m trying to fight a Raid Boss, I can enjoy the game and it’s mobs just fine without any other players.

pro tip: Craft something called a Beefalo Bell and then ring it beside a Beefalo, the entire game becomes easier when you have a noble stead with 1500hp that is basically just 1500 Health, Faster Movement Speed & Decent Melee Damage.

Beefalo ALSO Regenerate Health on their own when out of Combat without needing to waste foods on healing them, so yeah there’s that….

Which reminds me- Didn’t they add tameable Beefalo & Fences into single player Dont Starve when in all honesty… the game didn’t really even need that kind of boost in player Health, Speed & Damage?

[Hungry French]

13 minutes ago, Mike23Ua said:

So no normal game transfers all the content of the original into the sequel huh? Does anyone care to tell them about Left 4 Dead & Left 4 Dead 2? 

Just by such methods you create a new game and kill the last one.  And it's hard to call it a new game. It looks like a remake.

 

15 minutes ago, Mike23Ua said:

My point friend, is that no normal game transfers the content of a Sequel back over into the game that came out before it. I mean could imagine if they added the Stag hover jets of Saints Row 3 into Saints Row 1?! (which only show up after YOU accidentally kill an innocent girl in Saints Row 2 and so the Military is Hellbent on bringing you to Justice in SR 3) 

It is bad to transfer content from sequel to prequel and it is bad to transfer prequel content to sequel.
But in the case of DS and DST, it will be fair if the content is transferred to both games at once.

Klei still has the ability to create a new game and transfer all the DS and DST content.

28 minutes ago, Mike23Ua said:

If it’s because of extremely high health raid bosses, then you can just simply uhh not fight those? I mean like personally… I DONT Fight raid Bosses because I don’t see any “Point” in fighting raid Bosses..

Raid bosses is one of the main parts of the game. In the game, all bosses are raid, except Lord of the Fruit Flies.
The game even has raid mobs Chessmaster, Spider Warrior, Chess Monster and other creatures that had 2-3 times less health in DS.

 

30 minutes ago, Mike23Ua said:

If I’m playing the game to be challenged by the way I progress around & explore the map, to have the seasons challenge me- And to even alter world Gen settings to play the game in an experience more difficult than Default settings (such as lights out mode..)

DS and RoG are better suited for this. They are much harder than DST survivor and explore map.

 

32 minutes ago, Mike23Ua said:

Then fighting raid bosses who’s ONLY purpose is to give me an item that will make being challenged by the game easier with these new items- Doesn’t make much sense..

What will Toadstool give you ? Crab King ? Lunar and Shadow rift will make the game harder.

The game becomes easy after 100 days.
Only in DS it can be difficult after 100 days. Especially with out QoL update (there is an old version of DS in the incentive without the last QoL)

37 minutes ago, Mike23Ua said:

An excellent Example is Antlion- If you go fight or appease her she will stop damaging your world with sinkhole craters, BUT if you ignore fighting her… she goes from 2 sinkholes, up to 7.

A rare part of the game that makes DST harder to RoG, but RoG is still more difficult

 

39 minutes ago, Mike23Ua said:

And as someone who plays DST almost exclusively Alone: I can tell you that outside of raid bosses, and a small handful of mobs with endless minion spam - That DST is perfectly playable Alone.

It's just boring and too easy to play.
If I just explore the map and live 100 days, then I will get bored because there is nothing else to do.

 

42 minutes ago, Mike23Ua said:

I can play DST as Wes and unless I’m trying to fight a Raid Boss, I can enjoy the game and it’s mobs just fine without any other players.

Raid mobs. I'm not interested in killing spiders for 1000 days for the sake of eating raw monster meat.

48 minutes ago, Mike23Ua said:

pro tip: Craft something called a Beefalo Bell and then ring it beside a Beefalo, the entire game becomes easier when you have a noble stead with 1500hp that is basically just 1500 Health, Faster Movement Speed & Decent Melee Damage.

Beefalo ALSO Regenerate Health on their own when out of Combat without needing to waste foods on healing them, so yeah there’s that….

Beefalo has 500 hp in DS and 1000 in DST. Not 1500.

And I never tame a Bifallo. It's boring.

48 minutes ago, Mike23Ua said:

Which reminds me- Didn’t they add tameable Beefalo & Fences into single player Dont Starve when in all honesty… the game didn’t really even need that kind of boost in player Health, Speed & Damage?

It would be better if they added Bee Queen, Toadstool, Klaus and Antillion.

Been in DS and Shipwrecked drop Blueprint Bundling Wrap XDD

[Uedo]

52 minutes ago, Mike23Ua said:

Which reminds me- Didn’t they add tameable Beefalo & Fences into single player Dont Starve when in all honesty… the game didn’t really even need that kind of boost in player Health, Speed & Damage?

I believe they did! Not 100% sure though

[Mike23Ua]

22 minutes ago, Hungry French said:

Just by such methods you create a new game and kill the last one.  And it's hard to call it a new game. It looks like a remake.

 

It is bad to transfer content from sequel to prequel and it is bad to transfer prequel content to sequel.
But in the case of DS and DST, it will be fair if the content is transferred to both games at once.

Klei still has the ability to create a new game and transfer all the DS and DST content.

Raid bosses is one of the main parts of the game. In the game, all bosses are raid, except Lord of the Fruit Flies.
The game even has raid mobs Chessmaster, Spider Warrior, Chess Monster and other creatures that had 2-3 times less health in DS.

 

DS and RoG are better suited for this. They are much harder than DST survivor and explore map.

 

What will Toadstool give you ? Crab King ? Lunar and Shadow rift will make the game harder.

The game becomes easy after 100 days.
Only in DS it can be difficult after 100 days. Especially with out QoL update (there is an old version of DS in the incentive without the last QoL)

A rare part of the game that makes DST harder to RoG, but RoG is still more difficult

 

It's just boring and too easy to play.
If I just explore the map and live 100 days, then I will get bored because there is nothing else to do.

 

Raid mobs. I'm not interested in killing spiders for 1000 days for the sake of eating raw monster meat.

Beefalo has 500 hp in DS and 1000 in DST. Not 1500.

And I never tame a Bifallo. It's boring.

It would be better if they added Bee Queen, Toadstool, Klaus and Antillion.

Been in DS and Shipwrecked drop Blueprint Bundling Wrap XDD

First of all, taming a Beefalo in DST is as easy as crafting a bell and ringing it by its ear and then just feeding it sticks you pick up as it literally follows you everywhere you go from that point forward (including teleporting into and out of caves with you) just slap a saddle on its back and you can even passively tame him as you ride about.

Second- Bee Queen was added in A New Reign (Charlie’s Reign) after dethroning Wilson. Why would they add a boss Charlie created into a game that Wilson has yet to even have his Reign within?

Lastly- IF (& that’s a huge if) a third DLC expansion was to ever be added to single player Dont Starve it would likely be something similar to Shipwrecked or Hamlet, as in the DLC would be its own thing completely separated from the DS campaign..

I doubt they WILL add a third DLC to solo DS though, because they would more likely want to save new ideas for a DS 2 or whatever..

[Hungry French]

57 minutes ago, Uedo said:

I believe they did! Not 100% sure though

Yes

[Hungry French]

31 minutes ago, Mike23Ua said:

First of all, taming a Beefalo in DST is as easy as crafting a bell and ringing it by its ear and then just feeding it sticks you pick up as it literally follows you everywhere you go from that point forward (including teleporting into and out of caves with you) just slap a saddle on its back and you can even passively tame him as you ride about.

Using Beefalo makes the characters too identical...And it's just boring.
 

 

32 minutes ago, Mike23Ua said:

Second- Bee Queen was added in A New Reign (Charlie’s Reign) after dethroning Wilson. Why would they add a boss Charlie created into a game that Wilson has yet to even have his Reign within?

Ewecus was added in A New Reign (Charlie’s Reign) after dethroning Wilson.
And now she finds.

Klei can transfer almost anything to the DS.
Because the appearance in the DST does not guarantee that this was not in the DS.

Klei specifically do not reveal the secret of who Charlie created, and who Maxwell created, and who was not created by them. 
This adds mystery to the origin of the creatures.

+ adding a whole boss is already DLC's, and Klei is not planning it. ( for now )

Klei can make recanon at any second, as it was with Ewecus.

Or they may want to make DST a non-canonical spin-off.
Or supplement the DS with a non-canonical continuation of the plot 
( Literally, this idea should be DS 2. )

Yes. DST is a canonical (probably) spin-off.
Why do events occur after DS ?

Spin-off can be and occur after the events of the original and before the events of the original.

Why is DST not a sequel ? 

As a rule, the main difference between an spin-off and a sequel or prequel of  a work of art is the participation as the main actors of characters who were secondary or even episodic in the original work.

This is not a continuation of the Wilson and Maxwell story.

Here... Has anyone thought about who are the main characters in DST, who are the supporting characters? I think it 's worth a separate post .

58 minutes ago, Mike23Ua said:

Lastly- IF (& that’s a huge if) a third DLC expansion was to ever be added to single player Dont Starve it would likely be something similar to Shipwrecked or Hamlet, as in the DLC would be its own thing completely separated from the DS campaign..

Have you forgotten that RoG is also a paid dlc?  

And damn. Why make a new world again. It is better to make 1 world, but large and large-scale, so that it does not have 100 ( 50 Shipwrecked and Hamlet) days of content like a RoG, but 300-500 as in DST.

I'm in favor of DLC. Add new content for RoG, Shipwrecked and Hamlet worlds.

For DS, it will be possible to transfer the content of the DST. I think no one will mind.
 

But it's better to make DS 2. This has more potential for both the entire franchise and the singleplayer experience.
DS still has bugs and bad textures. And will it work stably with 4 additions ? Hamlet and Shipwrecked optimization is bad.

1 hour ago, Mike23Ua said:

I doubt they WILL add a third DLC to solo DS though, because they would more likely want to save new ideas for a DS 2 or whatever..

In DS2 they can transfer the content of DS, RoG, Shipwrecked, Hamlet, A new Reign, Return of them and From Beyond ( and future DST dlc's) + not DLC's content.

And they will be able to develop Shipwrecked and Hamlet as well as DST world and caves.

Add a skin system, multiplayer, single player.

But the whole point of DS is that Wilson is the main character.

The game will either be a continuation of the original DS without the influence of other survivors on the plot, they will be in their own worlds.

Or if you don't want to make DST a non-canon.

The plot may occur after DST.
And why does Wilson start over...
Maybe Ancient Fuelweaver's remark that events are repeating...
will be something more than what happened in the ruins.

The Don't Starve universe doesn't look like it could have a happy ending.

Remember DS ? The whole game is gloomy, Shipwrecked and Hamlet also manage to be gloomy, though not as much as DS.
Caves and ruins are up of gloom and atmosphere in DS, but DST has lost that atmosphere.
And at the end of the adventure mode after Wilson has gone through the trials of RoG, Shipwrecked and Hamlet. 
He becomes trapped in the cursed throne...

Bad ending.
 

Although in DST Klei changed the design and overall vision of the game to a more fun together. 
But will the ending be good ? Or bad ?

[Mike23Ua]

Actually… Reign of Giants was only a paid DLC on PC and PlayStation, but on Xbox & Nintendo Reign of Giants is a core base part of the game, and always has been.

I’ll do you one even better than that: When Klei released Dont Starve onto Nintendo Switch: they also bundled it with the Shipwrecked DLC (which was sold as a separate DLC on PC, PlayStation & Xbox)

So over on Nintendo, There’s No version of DS that you can buy that doesn’t already include Shipwrecked DLC.

If you want to get Technical- Klei could simply “Delist” Don’t Starve Giant Edition. And then there would be No version of Single player Dont starve that doesn’t also include the Shipwrecked DLC.

Hamlet on the other hand.. was sold separately on PC, Xbox, PlayStation & Nintendo. So it would be a different story-

The Mega Pack 2020 Includes DS, SW, HAM & DST (Reign of Giants is included but as part of the base game… not DLC.)

Klei could literally just De-List every other version of the game so that Mega is the only version that can be purchased (of course anyone who already owned the game or parts of the mega pack would get a free upgrade but that’s besides the point..)

The possibilities of Single player Don’t Starve getting another DLC expansion are pretty Low, but not completely impossible.

If all other versions of DS were to be delisted besides the Mega pack 2020, then Everyone playing the game would own DS (+RoG) DST, SW & Hamlet content.

When I bought state of decay 2 back when it released on Xbox One I had to buy each DLC pack for that game separately, HOWEVER when they Remastered the game with new graphics and a new gameplay engine, they included all the DLC I paid money for for Free as part of that Remaster, and Anyone who owned SoD 2 rather they bought the DLCs or Not… had their game updated to the Juggernaut Edition.

My point is that RoG was only a paid DLC on PC and PS4- But on Xbox & Switch it was always considered a core part of the game.

Klei could do that AGAIN now that Nintendo switch versions of Dont Starve come with Shipwrecked as part of the deal.

So the likelihood of Klei adding yet another DLC to Solo DS when they’re pretty much Green Light right now on just delisting inferior versions of the game, and having all future purchases include everything sounds illogical no?

[Hungry French]

1 hour ago, Mike23Ua said:

Actually… Reign of Giants was only a paid DLC on PC and PlayStation, but on Xbox & Nintendo Reign of Giants is a core base part of the game, and always has been.

I’ll do you one even better than that: When Klei released Dont Starve onto Nintendo Switch: they also bundled it with the Shipwrecked DLC (which was sold as a separate DLC on PC, PlayStation & Xbox)

So over on Nintendo, There’s No version of DS that you can buy that doesn’t already include Shipwrecked DLC.

If you want to get Technical- Klei could simply “Delist” Don’t Starve Giant Edition. And then there would be No version of Single player Dont starve that doesn’t also include the Shipwrecked DLC.

Hamlet on the other hand.. was sold separately on PC, Xbox, PlayStation & Nintendo. So it would be a different story-

The Mega Pack 2020 Includes DS, SW, HAM & DST (Reign of Giants is included but as part of the base game… not DLC.)

Klei could literally just De-List every other version of the game so that Mega is the only version that can be purchased (of course anyone who already owned the game or parts of the mega pack would get a free upgrade but that’s besides the point..)

Complete chaos.

 

1 hour ago, Mike23Ua said:

My point is that RoG was only a paid DLC on PC and PS4- But on Xbox & Switch it was always considered a core part of the game.

Here, rather, DLC's are released together with the main game. Yes, and most likely there is an opportunity to choose DS mode instead of RoG.

 

1 hour ago, Mike23Ua said:

The possibilities of Single player Don’t Starve getting another DLC expansion are pretty Low, but not completely impossible.

Sounds good

 

1 hour ago, Mike23Ua said:

When I bought state of decay 2 back when it released on Xbox One I had to buy each DLC pack for that game separately, HOWEVER when they Remastered the game with new graphics and a new gameplay engine, they included all the DLC I paid money for for Free as part of that Remaster, and Anyone who owned SoD 2 rather they bought the DLCs or Not… had their game updated to the Juggernaut Edition.

Usually remasters are made so that they would cost like the original + dlc's + remaster

1 hour ago, Mike23Ua said:

So the likelihood of Klei adding yet another DLC to Solo DS when they’re pretty much Green Light right now on just delisting inferior versions of the game, and having all future purchases include everything sounds illogical no?

It sounds logical, but now Klei is actively engaged in DLC From Beyond for DST.

So it won't be soon.

I think that instead of a remaster and dlc in which Klei will be more profitable to release a new game with DS content.

And make it the same service game as DST and on a new engine.

Still, Don't Starve is not the most popular franchise and releasing a "remaster" with one probably not big DLC's is not the best idea when there is a DST that has 3 DLC's and updates.

But the service game already sounds like something that DST players will buy even if they can't play co-op.  Unique content is an important part of attracting players. This is partly why many players switched from DS to DST.

They will come up with something by the end of the DST development.

 

At the moment, the main reference point when the DST will definitely not be completed is Skill Trees.
If Klei continues to produce 3 Skill Trees a year, then in 5 years all the characters will have it.
Then... From Beyond will definitely be completed.
It took 3 years to develop each DLC's.

I think I have such forecasts. 

2023-2025 - development From Beyond 

2026 - preparing for the next dlc and maybe the last skill tree

2027-2030 - development of the final dlc (4 years, because the final should be grandiose according to the idea)

I have doubts that Klei will make more than 4 dlc's for DST.
Maybe there will be a fifth.
But by that time, the DST will already be more than 15 years old.

It will be funny to look at the DS at that time, which in fact received unique content only in 2016 and 2019, and the DST has been filled with updates and dlc's for 15 years, and the DS will still have bug the nightmare creatures in ruin and no hd textures without mods.

If Klei doesn't come up with something for DS or DS 2.