EvangelineCrux Posted May 19, 2014 Share Posted May 19, 2014 We should have a # of players that should be able to survive of the land option. So like you could have 4 players on land that should only be able to have 1 person on it. Or 4 players on land that could support 8 people for some easy relaxed fun. I don't know how Klei would do it but wouldn't it be fun? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyAzure Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 I am a bit confused? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbeetle Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 I am a bit confused? I was going to explain it to you, but then I realized I also have no clue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CREU Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 you mean an way to see others playing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maximum124 Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 Ok I think I.....understand? They're saying that there should be predetermined amounts of resources, and that they're measured by how many people they can support So there could be an island with just the right amount of resources for one person to live well, but more then 1 person plays on it. I think thats what they're saying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeW Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 That's interesting. What he is suggesting is basically kind of a balance option. So, basically you would choose how many people that the game has enough resources to supply for. The game isn't really balanced so delicately that I think this would be possible, but it is certainly interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blewcheese Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 Well, you know your idea's a good one when JoeW posts on it. Or, at least, it's an "interesting" one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyAzure Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 That would mean inevitable death...but an option for one means.....only one Chester??! Oh the humanity! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Letter W Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 The option to turn off resource scaling per person? Neato. All eight of you must live off of the resources for one person. Tip top cheerio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XirmiX Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 Please more chesters! I don't want just one! If I'm playing in 4 player, I'd like myself a Snow chester AND a Shadow chester, sinse Shadow chester has more stacks and the Snow chester slows rotting of the foods. Please MORE CHESTERS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrtwoface Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 Please more chesters! I don't want just one! If I'm playing in 4 player, I'd like myself a Snow chester AND a Shadow chester, sinse Shadow chester has more stacks and the Snow chester slows rotting of the foods. Please MORE CHESTERS!I don't really see how this is relevant to the thread, but I think one Chester per person is quite enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XirmiX Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 I don't really see how this is relevant to the thread, but I think one Chester per person is quite enough.One per person AT least and fine with me. One chester through the world and I'm gonna be sad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoDeusMachina Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 One per person AT least and fine with me. One chester through the world and I'm gonna be sad 1 Chester per world seems fine to me, as far as we know Chester is not a ''race'', it's a unique creature. But as was mentionned, this is not relevant for the current thread! I do like the OP's idea, although I don't know how things could be balanced. You can survive with very little ressources, but in general, players like to hoard! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XirmiX Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 Hmm looks like chester is a mystery we will never solve... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvangelineCrux Posted May 30, 2014 Author Share Posted May 30, 2014 Sorry for the confusion. I'm basically saying that there should be an option for the DLC to be able to sort of tweak how many players a game has enough resources to support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.