BaloneyOs

你真承认了表里如一！那我看咱俩都说废话。你不张嘴随其实你便，就算胡说八道也可以。 有权发表自己的观点的能力是很好。西方人可以随便批评自己的国家，可是你练天安门的事件都不敢提。你不懂历史的话，那别人怎么能把你当回事那？那么看你更没有资格批评国外的想法。光会说单方的偏见就更没有信誉。至少承认双方都有问题在张嘴才会有效果。 应该再复习几个单词： censorship - 审查制度 hypocrisy - 虚伪的 Yeah Google Translate is hilarious with slang. Apparently 尿性 (literally urine sex) is regional, satirical slang for temperament, nature, capability, etc krypton = freemium Stuff referring to "gold" I believe is also some offset of slang about freemium models. And then we have the classic "Famine".

给你几个很有用的词。最好懂事以后再张嘴。 bias - 偏压 assumption - 假设 censorship - 审查制度 hypocrisy - 虚伪的 double standard - 双重标准 一九八九年的天安门事件听没听说过？如果知道的话，请解释那时候发生了什么事。

Everyone criticizes the wrongdoings of the rest of the world: nobody bats and eye. A few people criticize the wrongdoings of the CCP: DST_LSJ loses his mind. 你以为谁是个伪君子?

Oh really? I have this feeling that you're not in a position to preach arrogance if you don't understand the difference between challenged and banned.

If you don't think your ambiguous wording is susceptible to being misinterpreted then you do you, big man.

Then you can expect to continue being misinterpreted. I personally have nothing against that nor your speaking style.

What you said was very, very open to interpretation and your obvious bias contributes to that even more. Maybe you should've just said what you meant from the beginning.

yeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaah how about nahhh?

Just because you tell people to stop reviewing games in a way you don't like doesn't mean they will. Ok this is too much fun.

To put things in perspective, Tencent only owned a 5% share of Activision-Blizzard at the time of the incident. Tencent owns at least 51% of Klei. Chances are that even if it was 5%, Klei would have considerably less bargaining power than Blizzard did.

Not sure if another troll but I'll bite again: Then don't choose to engage in the thread, guys?? Yes it's that simple. Why are you still here, reading this thread? Isn't 32 pages of what you don't want to read enough for you to reach that decision?

I have that impression of them as well, as their games have always been very reasonably priced for their outstanding quality with generous seasonal discounts as the cherry on top. Just saying that greed is probably the next best explanation after impending bankrupcy. Things can change and money is obviously a huge catalyst.

How about greed? Dude thinks we can't see his overwhelming bias or his strawman. Either he doesn't get it or can't afford to admit without getting into trouble so we should probably give up, because he's repeated the same point ad nauseam without any new counterpoints.

Now the people who defend Tencent in the forum are so hypocritical. They mislead themselves by falling back on whataboutism. They defend against the objections to Tencent with deep bias. But turned a blind eye to the objective problems around the company they defend. This is double standard. In the perspective of Tencent's defenders, their only real means of defense is "well other people are also doing it so you have no right to criticize", and they believe pointing out others' flaws will meaningfully even the playing field because they know they can't claim to be in the right to begin with. They are nothing except to downplay others' concerns online despite preaching about how one side isn't better than the other. See how easy it is?