chirsg

  • Content Count

    294
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

514 Excellent

About chirsg

  • Rank
    Member
...

Recent Profile Visitors

586 profile views
  1. I want the opposite. I use trees to decorate and it's a hassle that every planted tree is doomed for petrification. You must not have played a world past day 500. Petrification happens very reliably, very frequently. Commit to a world and see that i'm right.
  2. I haven't had the chance to play the beta the entire day. It's not like I can play it on my phone. I however, can access the forums on my phone, enabling me to voice my concerns. Maxil was kind enough to show the settings that switch off griefer protection and I will do that when the qol beta goes live. To be honest though, I don't even know if this will be possible at all on retrofitted worlds, so I may even be bits out of luck if they don't enable this for my world. You and @gaymime seem to want to argue or dismiss my concerns for a reason I am not sure of. I have actually made a thread thanking klei and their artists for releasing the new victorian skins. I don't just dislike things klei do. Keep your prejudices to yourself and don't make things so personal because I am iffy about a feature that's about to be added in, both of you.
  3. You 've failed to read why i don't like the new feature. I don't dismiss it for no reason. I don't have time to play the patch at leisure any time i want so i will express concerns. If you scroll up on page 2, you will find an image accompanied by my explanation of my concerns over "anti griefing" I don't have a "schtick" You're extremely rude to suggest that. You 've failed to read why i don't like the new feature. I don't dismiss it for no reason. I don't have time to play the patch at leisure any time i want so i will express concerns. If you scroll up on page 2, you will find an image accompanied by my explanation of my concerns over "anti griefing" I don't have a "schtick" You're extremely rude to suggest that. You 've failed to read why i don't like the new feature. I don't dismiss it for no reason. I don't have time to play the patch at leisure any time i want so i will express concerns. If you scroll up on page 2, you will find an image accompanied by my explanation of my concerns over "anti griefing" I don't have a "schtick" You're extremely rude to suggest that. You 've failed to read why i don't like the new feature. I don't dismiss it for no reason. I don't have time to play the patch at leisure any time i want so i will express concerns. If you scroll up on page 2, you will find an image accompanied by my explanation of my concerns over "anti griefing" I don't have a "schtick" You're extremely rude to suggest that.
  4. they don't regrow when you convert your existing survival to endless.
  5. I have an immigration zone in my 7000+ day world nearing 8000 days very shortly. I have walls of endtables to ensure that new players won't be able to leave until I give them permission in order to protect everything I have made. New griefer spawn protection shoots that to feces. So far, this system I have works for me. If a player doesn't like it, they leave. If a player is curious about my 7000 days, they ask to be freed. I want this setting to be toggled. Dully applied if the world is retrofitted.
  6. You don't know what world gen will grant you. If you boot up a survival world and end up with better world gen than any endless has ever given you, one won't shelve the world and exclaim "Oh well, it's survival, not worth keeping it." On my survival, i have dev graves, basalt jail, pig torches, triple mac, good peninsulas and decent wormholes. I don't think this is a good attitude for survival, dismissing the possibility of renewable bushes just because 'you're fated to die.' Berry bushes in my opinion are worthless when not wild. They require mundane non engaging fertilization, do not germinate like farm crops, not special in the crockpot, aren't special cooked and quite frankly, take too much space. Anyone could do without berries as a food source. All the updates up to this point has seen to that. Farms germinate, hunt still yields big food rewards, spiders, birds only requiring monster meat uncooked for eggs, the sea, stonefruit, kelp. It honestly wouldn't be unbalanced for berries to just multiply somehow. In order to make the world more lively.
  7. Yeah, i'm 100% with this. Still pretty bitter about the treatment. it simply isn't cool. Could still be salvaged maybe. I could envision cool items after the mysterious energy patch "boss" gets beaten. e.g: Woodie gets an item that summons the full moon at night, willow gets an item that fully fuels firepits, endos and nightmare lights in a huge radius and wigfrid gets MJOLNIR
  8. Don't hold your breath. People on this forum crucified me for suggesting a way of obtaining juicy berries in a default world. It's a good idea to be able to have more bushes and more varieties in one world, but people on the forums hate the idea.
  9. no they're not. bat wings have always been good to have. even before the recipe reduction, it was a reliable way for wormwoods to heal using batbat. when you cook them, they heal 8 hp even before the drop rate increase. what you said isn't an exaggeration. it's just incorrect.
  10. i agree. her songs aren't that useful in day to day situations, but klei seems to have made their bed with this. they don't want her using her powers against normal mobs.
  11. I don't hate select character skins being pricey. Adds a level of prestige and wonder. I find wigfrids guest of honor lackluster now, but when it was the most expensive skin of the market, it was cool to see wigfrids sporting them
  12. I was banned for "Asking questions in bad faith" One of the most rampant issues within the don't starve community is misinformation being spread. I don't remember what, but I asked a question about a certain mechanic and asked for some sort of confirmation. One of the nitro boosters unleashed on me and in return, I may have responded very sarcastically. It would perhaps make sense if I were banned for bad behavior and I would have appealed for that, but "asking questions in bad faith?" That has no meaning. Addressing an issue in people going on record about blatant lies about the game's mechanics and defending your incorrect stance as doctrine is ridiculous enough to dispute. Apparently it's unacceptable in the server to ask a question and request evidence of truth.
  13. I will criticize Klei when it comes to choices they make that I think are underwhelming or ones that I disagree with, but I have a habit of being quiet when it comes to things they do that I appreciate. The victorian skins would have almost been the latter, but honestly, i think skins of this nature have been a long time coming and I'm glad they're here. I dislike mega basing and hamlet was my first (legitimate) don't starve experience. City planning is a passion of mine in the context of dst building and I'm one step closer to truly achieving that. The art team did the most tasteful job at these skins and if any sort of city planning takes place in future dst patches, the victorian designers are your guys. It's all just so neat and tidy, very pleasing to look at and a blast to build with. Thanks for ending my small hiatus, thanks so much for these skins and I hope to see expansion on the victorian skinset because I'm putting money into it and I hope the big spenders follow suit. Cheers Klei and papa tencent.