Sign in to follow this  
cmccann

Look at Sack without equipping

Recommended Posts

Wouldn't this make the chest a little obsolete? The backpack is quite inexpensive (4 cut grass and 4 twigs) vs. 12 logs (or 3 boards) required for a chest. I would gladly accept one less inventory slot if this was the case. The only reason I have chests instead of backpacks is sheer convenience as I don't like having to equip the backpack every time I want to see what is already in there.

I think it is fine the way it is TBH mate :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bogpad    21

I absolutely agree with flash. the only real bonus the chest has to offer since the backpack is that it is more convenient to use, one slot is nothing, especially considdering the low costs of the backpack. If the devs decide to make the backpack usable on the ground, noone would use chests anymore, leaving Krampus useless aswell. Very bad idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
R__Man    12

The bonus to backpacks over chests being the ability to look in them seems more than a little odd. I think you should be able to look in backpacks without equiping them, and Krampus would steal an entire backpack in one swipe. Chests he would steal one item at a time and/or need to break it first.

I'm 99% sure the only reason he doesn't steal backpacks at the moment is the fact that it needs to remember what was in the backpack instead of just dropping an empty one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this