selereth Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 Hi Klei, There was another thread that I started yesterday asking players if their FPS had increased since updating from the beta to the launch version of the game. Well a number of replies flooded in and there seems to be a consensus that frame rates have not improved all that much. From my own experience, frame rates have not really improved at all for me; in fact, they've actually decreased from QoL Mk3. I loaded up a base that I had started many months ago and was getting 35-40 FPS when beforehand I had gotten 45-50 FPS on max speed and something like 23 dupes. Either way, I ask that you please look into this issue, I was also experiencing a lot of stuttering after launching rockets in the beta branch and while I haven't had an opportunity to launch a rocket since the game released yesterday, I want to cover all of my concerns in this post. I also noticed a bit of a memory leak where the game seems to be consuming more and more of my RAM every time I load up a save file. My specs are more than capable of running the game: Core i7 6700 16 GB DDR4 2133Mhz RAM GTX 1070 Those are the relevant specs anyhow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gracefulmuse Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 There was a thread started here quite a while back that measured performance compared to system specs. You could be getting bottle necked by your RAM frequency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selereth Posted July 31, 2019 Author Share Posted July 31, 2019 2 minutes ago, Gracefulmuse said: There was a thread started here quite a while back that measured performance compared to system specs. You could be getting bottle necked by your RAM frequency. That still doesn't explain how performance has worsened since QoL Mk3, nor does it explain how a base that I started several months ago is running worse now than it was pre-launch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moah Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 Have you tried to disable logging in the games menues? There is a new option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 2 hours ago, selereth said: Hi Klei, There was another thread that I started yesterday asking players if their FPS had increased since updating from the beta to the launch version of the game. Well a number of replies flooded in and there seems to be a consensus that frame rates have not improved all that much. From my own experience, frame rates have not really improved at all for me; in fact, they've actually decreased from QoL Mk3. I loaded up a base that I had started many months ago and was getting 35-40 FPS when beforehand I had gotten 45-50 FPS on max speed and something like 23 dupes. Either way, I ask that you please look into this issue, I was also experiencing a lot of stuttering after launching rockets in the beta branch and while I haven't had an opportunity to launch a rocket since the game released yesterday, I want to cover all of my concerns in this post. I also noticed a bit of a memory leak where the game seems to be consuming more and more of my RAM every time I load up a save file. My specs are more than capable of running the game: Core i7 6700 16 GB DDR4 2133Mhz RAM GTX 1070 Those are the relevant specs anyhow. Of course, I am not a developer or a programmer, but as far as I understand, this thing takes control of the process. Is this the same debugging? The removal did not introduce any changes, but who knows how it is related. It is possible that some debugging functions simply launch this and collect information in order to transfer to this collector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selereth Posted July 31, 2019 Author Share Posted July 31, 2019 1 hour ago, Moah said: Have you tried to disable logging in the games menues? There is a new option. Are you talking about the data collection option? That's all I can see. Anyway, I disabled it and there's no change in FPS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurgel Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 The good folks at Klei are probably catching up on sleep at the moment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moah Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 16 hours ago, selereth said: Are you talking about the data collection option? That's all I can see. Anyway, I disabled it and there's no change in FPS. Yes, that's what i meant. Bad that it did not help you. I myself have no problems with fps but I know how annoying that is. When i remember back how huge the old maps were, i get nostalgic. i really miss that But i don't know whats better. Bigger/Huge maps or more funcuality. I really hope they can optimise the game further. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selereth Posted August 2, 2019 Author Share Posted August 2, 2019 On 8/1/2019 at 5:17 AM, Moah said: Yes, that's what i meant. Bad that it did not help you. I myself have no problems with fps but I know how annoying that is. When i remember back how huge the old maps were, i get nostalgic. i really miss that But i don't know whats better. Bigger/Huge maps or more funcuality. I really hope they can optimise the game further. I started a new save file since the launch update came out, just to rule out any possibility of it being a beta save file issue and have reached cycle 110. I am getting about 55 FPS on 2x speed and 50 FPS on 3x speed, this is when I am panning around my base. Would you or anyone else be willing to run this save file and let me know what FPS you're getting? I want to see if the performance I'm getting is similar to other people's performance. Hiigara .sav Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blazing Falken Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 1 hour ago, selereth said: I started a new save file since the launch update came out, just to rule out any possibility of it being a beta save file issue and have reached cycle 110. I am getting about 55 FPS on 2x speed and 50 FPS on 3x speed, this is when I am panning around my base. Would you or anyone else be willing to run this save file and let me know what FPS you're getting? I want to see if the performance I'm getting is similar to other people's performance. Hiigara .sav Full normal zoomed out (not screenshot mode) in the starting position, observed for one full cycle each: 2x: 22-25 fps 3x: 18-20 fps Gtx 1050ti @ 1920x1080 60hz Core 2 Duo @ 3.16ghz 8g DDR2 @ 800mhz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slvrsrfr Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 I likely have one of the lowest rated systems attempting to run this. So, I will try to gather this info and throw it up later.. Operating System: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (10.0, Build 17134) (17134.rs4_release.180410-1804) Language: English (Regional Setting: English) System Manufacturer: Dell Inc. System Model: OptiPlex 380 BIOS: Phoenix ROM BIOS PLUS Version 1.10 A05 (type: BIOS) Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7500 @ 2.93GHz (2 CPUs), ~2.9GHz Memory: 3072MB RAM Available OS Memory: 3070MB RAM Page File: 2698MB used, 1266MB available DirectX Version: DirectX 12 DX Setup Parameters: Not found Miracast: Not Available Microsoft Graphics Hybrid: Not Supported DxDiag Version: 10.00.17134.0001 64bit Unicode Card name: NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GE Manufacturer: NVIDIA Chip type: GeForce 9300 GE DAC type: Integrated RAMDAC Device Type: Full Device (POST) Display Memory: 1770 MB Dedicated Memory: 235 MB Shared Memory: 1534 MB Current Mode: 1920 x 1080 (32 bit) (60Hz) HDR Support: Not Supported Display Topology: Internal Driver Name: nvd3dumx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll Driver File Version: 21.21.0013.4201 (English) Driver Version: 21.21.13.4201 DDI Version: 11.1 Feature Levels: 10_0,9_3,9_2,9_1 Driver Model: WDDM 1.2 I think that's the most important stuff... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MauPow Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 I'm getting about 9 fps on my cycle 600 base. It was mostly fine last week, 25-35, then after launch this base is unplayable. Started it maybe 2 weeks ago. i7-6700k, 16gb RAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonEmpire Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 I mentioned it during the preview beta testing about this issue. How the game leaks memory over time if you keep loading save files over time without quitting. Fresh game launches with first time save file load seems fast. But after that loading saves while the game has launched already will result in some performance decrease. And memory consumption increase. I believe the cycle reports info is causing issues. Would probably help if there was an option to completely disable reports or storing only a certain amount. Or they need to change their reports saving scheme such a way that is a separate file logging. Similar to how they separate time-lapse. There really is no need to keep auto saving the reports over and over or storing the entire reports in memory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selereth Posted August 2, 2019 Author Share Posted August 2, 2019 28 minutes ago, MauPow said: I'm getting about 9 fps on my cycle 600 base. It was mostly fine last week, 25-35, then after launch this base is unplayable. Started it maybe 2 weeks ago. i7-6700k, 16gb RAM. Would you mind uploading the save file? I could run it on my computer to see how it does. Specs are almost identical to yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MauPow Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 Just now, selereth said: Would you mind uploading the save file? I could run it on my computer to see how it does. Specs are almost identical to yours. Sure, won't be till tomorrow though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.be472dde0e9c7c0b3609b5656583b014.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
Please be aware that the content of this thread may be outdated and no longer applicable.