Sign in to follow this  
chemie

Are pressure switches used as a switch an exploit?

Recommended Posts

chemie    2
Posted (edited)

The actual switch, along with valves, require a dup to "touch it" to make a change.

A pressure switch (temp, air, liquid) do not require a touch.

So set it to max level and just toggle (above/below) to control on/off without dup intervention.

 

Exploit or working as intended? 

Edited by chemie
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fernir    6

Generally an exploit.

Somehow acceptable because dupe-switch interactions are a bit wonky at times.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Risu    187

It's more an oversight that they don't require interaction but yep.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A potential solution would be to use the super computer as a central device to control all electronic systems in the base. Also stops it becoming redundant once the research has finished. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
brummbar7    363

I'm not entirely sure.  The thing is, atmo/temp/level switches can be placed in some pretty extreme environments, and because of how extreme they are they're often very hard to access, if not entirely walled off.  As opposed to valves which aren't sensing anything, they're just allowing stuff to pass-through.  If atmo/temp/level switches required dupe adjustment, I think a lot of current system designs would become much more problematic.  Valves can be in the same situation, but I think they generally have more flexibility of placement, so the player can put them outside the most extreme areas.  I've been assuming they're either as intended, or the devs are just leaving them for now, due to the general alpha state of the game, as they seem to be doing with a host of other things. 

The computer thing has been suggested before, and I do think it's a good idea.  Then they could easily justify making the sensors manual-adjust by default, since there would also be a remote solution.  It could be enhanced by making computers only able to communicate through normal wire.  Then you'd either need to have one per circuit, or create one computer with switched connections to several circuits.  Which they could further discourage if they wanted to.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could also have a type of wireless signal that gets blocked or greatly reduced by certain materials such as metal for example. So you'd have to put in boosters and hardwire receivers through specific walls. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this